On 13 January 2016 at 21:34, FRIGN wrote:
> I must honestly say that I'm not convinced a GSoC would be a good influx
> of positive activity for suckless projects.
It would have a good PR effect at least.
> It takes a while for people to develop the right mindset and understand
> the philosophy b
FRIGN writes:
> I must honestly say that I'm not convinced a GSoC would be a good influx
> of positive activity for suckless projects.
On the other hand it could be an amusing gambling project. The lottery
ticket can be filled out in no time given the work from an earlier
application. It's only
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:28:43 +0100
Martti Kühne wrote:
Hey Martti,
> I'm awaiting the hour when you guys start sighing in despair over a
> gsoc fork of dwm that makes linux look like windows' dwm.exe because
> the hipsters were all about feature creep instead. Some others would
> argue that's wh
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:15 PM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I also don't see a reason not to try. I've seen many hipsterops
> lately that use dwm in my university. Since google is all about
> prestige there is definitely a chance.
>
I'm awaiting the hour when you guys start sighing in
