On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:19:01 +0100
Mattias Andrée wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm written an alternative to at, called sat (for simple
> at): https://github.com/maandree/sat sat is incompatible
> with at, but I have tried to make sure that a
> compatibility-layer can be written.
>
> sat is basically at wit
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016, Greg Reagle wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
>> Yes, please let's stop writing process management code into daemons and
>> instead solve this problem in a portable and non-sucky way.
>
> It's called runit: http://smarden.org/runit/
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 19:05:50 +0100
Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> > sat will create a PID file in $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR.
>
> PID files are a flawed concept, race conditions and
> everything.
Well. But they are standard. satd does not use the
PID file to determine whether it is running, it uses
flock.
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 06:05:58PM +0100, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> Yes, please let's stop writing process management code into daemons and
> instead solve this problem in a portable and non-sucky way.
It's called runit: http://smarden.org/runit/
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 18:05:58 +0100
Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> > Wouldn't you need a service supervisor with at's
> > functionallity?
>
> No. Separation of concerns.
>
> > If you are paranoid about sat crashing
>
> When in doubt, assume the component will crash/fail.
>
> > as long as you c
> Wouldn't you need a service supervisor with at's functionallity?
No. Separation of concerns.
> If you are paranoid about sat crashing
When in doubt, assume the component will crash/fail.
> as long as you can have user-private services.
Yes, please let's stop writing process management code i
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 12:15:18PM +, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> At the end of the day, a bug is a bug irrespective of how it was introduced.
>
> I will have a look at the patch tomorrow.
My opinion is that all the code imported should be removed and
written in house.
If you are paranoid about sat crashing and
not get your jobs executed, it is possible
to start sat under service supervision,
as long as you can have user-private services.
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 15:17:43 +0100
Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> > satd is an unprivileged daemon that is user-private, and
>
Wouldn't you need a service supervisor with
at's functionallity? Are there any?
If you want to do things really simply you can use
sleep-until (https://github.com/maandree/sleep-until),
but then you cannot as easily list jobs and run
the before scheduled.
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 15:17:43 +0100
Kamil
> satd is an unprivileged daemon that is user-private, and
> starts and exits automatically.
Why not use a service supervisor?
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 12:52:31PM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:21:05 +0100
> isabella parakiss wrote:
>
> Hey Isabella,
>
> > i've been told on #2f30 that my opinion is void until i submit meaningful
> > patches. this is a rant^Wbreakdown and fix of a random tool in ubase
>
>
On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 11:21:05 +0100
isabella parakiss wrote:
Hey Isabella,
> i've been told on #2f30 that my opinion is void until i submit meaningful
> patches. this is a rant^Wbreakdown and fix of a random tool in ubase
I'll look deeper into this later, but I want to note here that back in th
i've been told on #2f30 that my opinion is void until i submit meaningful
patches. this is a rant^Wbreakdown and fix of a random tool in ubase
$ echo abcd | dd bs=1 count=1 skip=1 2>/dev/null # any other dd
b
$ echo abcd | ubase dd bs=1 count=1 skip=1 quiet; echo $?
dd: copy: Success
22
"wtf i
For the same reason we don't care about the state of
the buffer in clearundo() we can reset modflag in
clearbuf(), because after calling it we don't want
to know anything about the previous state.
---
ed.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ed.c b/ed.c
index 751e97
-s flag disables such warnings.
---
ed.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ed.c b/ed.c
index 1cf0d60..7e7fbb6 100644
--- a/ed.c
+++ b/ed.c
@@ -623,7 +623,8 @@ doread(char *fname)
}
inject(s);
}
- printf("%zu\n", cnt)
When we discard the content of an undo buffer
is because we don't need it anymore, and it means
that we don't care about the modify state of the buffer
so we can reset the modflag in clearundo(), and
remove this assignation each time clearundo() is called.
---
ed.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 inser
These funcction initializes the scratch buffer, and in case of
having a file name parameter it loads the file in the scratch.
It also fixes a problem before this version, where the saved
filename was not set when the file didn't exist.
---
ed.c | 32 ++--
1 file changed
Hi!
I'm written an alternative to at, called sat (for simple
at): https://github.com/maandree/sat sat is incompatible
with at, but I have tried to make sure that a
compatibility-layer can be written.
sat is basically at without a lot of features that does not
need to be there. sat is also written
18 matches
Mail list logo
