On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 07:32:34PM -0800, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> Does the same thing happen if you switch dwm to tiling mode before
> launching Torchlight 2? I don't recall the details, but I ran into some
> strange issues running Torchlight (1) some years ago that could be fixed
> by switching to fl
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:37:43PM -0300, Draco Metallium(Rodrigo S. Cañibano)
wrote:
> Most games work fine, but today I wanted to play "Torchlight 2" and
> the framerate was less than a half what it is in fluxbox (just test
> it), and when I move the mouse the game gets stuck for a second.
>
> A
Most games work fine, but today I wanted to play "Torchlight 2" and
the framerate was less than a half what it is in fluxbox (just test
it), and when I move the mouse the game gets stuck for a second.
Any idea what it might be?
--
Draco Metallium
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:04:19 +0100
hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> well, his concern is legit. not all terminals show 80 columns. i have
> one open right now that doesn't, so your rule is not all that matters
> on the internet. what's worse: some people send mails with more than
> 80 chars per li
well, his concern is legit. not all terminals show 80 columns. i have
one open right now that doesn't, so your rule is not all that matters
on the internet. what's worse: some people send mails with more than
80 chars per line.
this is also one of the few reasons i recommend people not to use pdf
a
Greetings.
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:43:02 +0100 xire.lue...@gmail.com wrote:
> Then fine, set the default as whatever width you like
> for symbol wrapping, but should that not be done
> client-side? For example, when quoting, won't the
> text be pushed out further than that hard-wrap limit?
>
> Pre
Hi,
2015-11-30 9:50 GMT+01:00, xire.lue...@gmail.com :
> Then fine, set the default as whatever width you like
> for symbol wrapping, but should that not be done
> client-side? For example, when quoting, won't the
> text be pushed out further than that hard-wrap limit?
>
> Presumably, prior to sen
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 02:50:40 -0600
wrote:
> Then fine, set the default as whatever width you like
> for symbol wrapping, but should that not be done
> client-side? For example, when quoting, won't the
> text be pushed out further than that hard-wrap limit?
>
> Presumably, prior to sending you ar
Then fine, set the default as whatever width you like
for symbol wrapping, but should that not be done
client-side? For example, when quoting, won't the
text be pushed out further than that hard-wrap limit?
Presumably, prior to sending you are still using soft
wrapping and then it adds the hard-wr
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:10:04 -0600
wrote:
> Apologies that you dislike my current mailer;
> where is the archive?
> And why is it netiquette to have line breaks instead
> of line wrapping client-side?
If the sender does the client wrapping, it can either
be automatic or manual, and it can be don
> And why is it netiquette to have line breaks instead
> of line wrapping client-side?
I think someone has just volunteered to submit an RFC on how to send
electronic mail between computers with a multitude of different
architectures and screen sizes on the internet in the 21st century.
Because,
11 matches
Mail list logo
