Hi there,
On 18 October 2015 at 15:46, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:46:50 +0200 Markus Teich
> wrote:
>> I just noticed, that the git log of surf[0] is stuck at commit 8e88984
>> “Fixing
>> the paxctl check.” from 2015-08-19. In the summary tab or if I expan
Greetings.
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:46:50 +0200 Markus Teich
wrote:
> Heyho,
>
> I just noticed, that the git log of surf[0] is stuck at commit 8e88984 “Fixing
> the paxctl check.” from 2015-08-19. In the summary tab or if I expand the log,
> the HEAD is correctly displayed as c81fbba “Style clea
- Compiling and testing on various platforms, think: Linux (musl,
glibc), OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc, compilers: gcc, clang, etc.
I would like to have musl, but it seems that I still have not idea how
to build surf, dwm and st with musl. I can't get `musl-gcc` to work on
Arch, there seems to be a lot
On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 12:59:18 +0200
Markus Teich wrote:
Hey Markus,
> I just noticed, that the git log of surf[0] is stuck at commit 8e88984 “Fixing
> the paxctl check.” from 2015-08-19. In the summary tab or if I expand the log,
> the HEAD is correctly displayed as c81fbba “Style cleanup.” from
On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:22:47 -0500
xire.lue...@gmail.com wrote:
> You are only giving the appearance of wanting to show everyone how
> 1337 you are, which is a heck of a lot more worthless than not
> wanting to use git.
Take it easy.
1337 - 1295 = 42. Illuminati confirmed.
--
FRIGN
Heyho,
I just noticed, that the git log of surf[0] is stuck at commit 8e88984 “Fixing
the paxctl check.” from 2015-08-19. In the summary tab or if I expand the log,
the HEAD is correctly displayed as c81fbba “Style cleanup.” from 2015-10-13.
I can reproduce this with surf and chromium, both withou
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> - Subscribe to @hackers, run the latest code, lurk on IRC.
> - Writing / fixing documentation: fix incomplet parts, typos, manpage
> syntax bugs etc.
> - Compiling and testing on various platforms, think: Linux (musl,
> glibc), OpenBSD, NetBSD, etc, compilers: gcc, clang, e
Thanks for the hint, I'm still learning the code. In my patch w was == mw, BTW.
I think you've already understood my point so there's no need to
discuss further. If someone feel like me then we may share ideas, for
now I can use our lovely wiki.
Regards,
Claudio
2015-10-18 12:04 GMT+02:00 Hiltjo
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Claudio wrote:
> Hi dears,
>
> I noticed that vertical listing is done by indenting items at the same level
> as the prompt length, which to me doesn't make any sense. The attached patch
> make it works as I expect.
>
> Is it the intended behaviour or is it indeed
Actually the prompt is highlighted (so is the selected item) which already
does the trick. Indenting the items is a bit weird IMHO.
Do I put the patch into the wiki or we could discuss about including it in
head?
Note: the previous patch had a problem which I fixed in the attached one.
Regards,
C
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Matthew of Boswell
wrote:
> So no need to work on any of the menial tasks? Just code, test,
> and fix? Sounds good.
>
No, menial / easy tasks are also greatly appreciated and important.
Everyone can help in some way. Some often overlooked parts which
everyone can
Claudio wrote:
> I noticed that vertical listing is done by indenting items at the same level
> as the prompt length, which to me doesn't make any sense.
Heyho Claudio,
it helps to differentiate between prompt and input visually.
--Markus
Hi dears,
I noticed that vertical listing is done by indenting items at the same
level as the prompt length, which to me doesn't make any sense. The
attached patch make it works as I expect.
Is it the intended behaviour or is it indeed a bug?
Regards,
Claudio
dmenu-4.6-novertoff.diff
Descripti
13 matches
Mail list logo
