Re: [dev] Re: Stali RC

2015-10-02 Thread Jens Staal
On Friday 02 October 2015 16.59.57 Christian Neukirchen wrote: > (Statically linking X11 apps results in massively bloated binaries, > I can't recommend it.) Anyone tried a static wayland dwm-like client like velox and its wayland- ported variants of st and dmenu?

[dev] Re: Stali RC

2015-10-02 Thread Christian Neukirchen
FRIGN writes: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:21:57 + (UTC) > Richard wrote: > > Hey Richard, > >> - looking further ahead; has there been any thoughts towards a >> staticallylinked/musl-based X11 server? Is it feasible to simply take >> the xorg sources and compile those with static linking or does

Re: [dev] Stali RC

2015-10-02 Thread Greg Reagle
On 10/02/2015 10:21 AM, Richard wrote: - do we install a pager? I've look in bin for more/less/pg etc. Are there any plans for a pager? I looked in the TODO documents for both sbase and ubase but did not notice any. I am also curious about the pager.

Re: [dev] Stali RC

2015-10-02 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 04:29:09PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:21:57 + (UTC) > Richard wrote: > > Hey Richard, > > > - looking further ahead; has there been any thoughts towards a > > staticallylinked/musl-based X11 server? Is it feasible to simply take > > the xorg sources a

Re: [dev] Stali RC

2015-10-02 Thread FRIGN
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:21:57 + (UTC) Richard wrote: Hey Richard, > - looking further ahead; has there been any thoughts towards a > staticallylinked/musl-based X11 server? Is it feasible to simply take > the xorg sources and compile those with static linking or does that > not work (or would

Re: [dev] Stali RC

2015-10-02 Thread Richard
- Original Message - > From: Dimitris Papastamos > As it stands, there is a lot of work to be done on stali. Do not > expect it to just work. If you want to help, then send some patches > to hackers@ for consideration. Actually, having set my expectations very low, I am finding that i

Re: [dev] sbase: od: type 'c': format characters in octal as specified by standard

2015-10-02 Thread FRIGN
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:41:56 -0400 Greg Reagle wrote: Hey Greg, first, please send your patches to hackers@, not dev@. > This is relative to master. This seems to be required by the base > standard, not an XSI extension. This patch is wrong. The c-flag should print the characters unless they

[dev] sbase: od: type 'c': format characters in octal as specified by standard

2015-10-02 Thread Greg Reagle
This is relative to master. This seems to be required by the base standard, not an XSI extension. >From 4bdc2f611795e683405b55ac574247262a485f9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Reagle Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 09:38:39 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] od: type 'c': format characters in octal as specifie