[dev] Re: [dvtm] Default command mapping changes

2015-07-15 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:45:20PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: > In an effort to bring more attention to the dvtm project, I'm working on > some additional documentation. Thanks, that is appreciated. > In the process, I've done a full review > of all the default command keys and would like to propose

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:59:33PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:45:49PM +0200, v4hn wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:32:38AM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: > > > $ pstree -p 2199 > > > dvtm(2199)─┬─sh(2239)───bash(2240)───mutt(11096) > > >├─sh(2324)───b

Re: [dev] I don't get mailinglists.

2015-07-15 Thread tautolog
My impression is the following, if it matters: 1. dev@ is like a users@ list, since ‎all users should be devs 2. hackers@ is like a submit@ or patches@ list Does that sound right, or is the analogy muddying things up even more? Ben   Original Message   From: Christoph Lohmann Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [dev] I don't get mailinglists.

2015-07-15 Thread Calvin Morrison
On 15 July 2015 at 14:13, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > Greetings. > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:13:42 +0200 Ross Mohn wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: >> > I wanted more mailinglists, but Anselm didn’t like more. There is no >> > support >> >

Re: [dev] I don't get mailinglists.

2015-07-15 Thread Ross Mohn
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:27:27PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > I wanted more mailinglists, but Anselm didn’t like more. There is no support > at suckless, so there's no need for support@. And yet, the stated purpose of dev@ is now "endless support threads".

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread Dimitris Papastamos
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:11:22PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: > That highlights my frustration with the new definitions for the mailing > lists. I am a hacker/developer and really only ask a question when I > need a little help hacking on the code. As you can see, my question led > me to submit the pa

[dev] [dvtm] very minor fix to config.def.h

2015-07-15 Thread Ross Mohn
See attached patch. -Ross diff --git a/config.def.h b/config.def.h index e25d83c..2681bd7 100644 --- a/config.def.h +++ b/config.def.h @@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ static KeyBinding bindings[] = { { { MOD, KEY_F(3), }, { view, { tags[2] } } }, { { MOD, KEY_F(4), }, { v

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread Ross Mohn
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 06:45:05PM +0200, Markus Teich wrote: > Ross Mohn wrote: > > Yes, I'd like to send these just to hackers@, where they belong > > Heyho Ross, > > I don't think hackers@ was the right choice. It was a support question, > neither > a patch nor a discussion about a proposed p

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread Ross Mohn
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:45:49PM +0200, v4hn wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:32:38AM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: > > $ pstree -p 2199 > > dvtm(2199)─┬─sh(2239)───bash(2240)───mutt(11096) > >├─sh(2324)───bash(2325) > >├─sh(12015)───bash(12016)───vim(17544) >

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread Markus Teich
Ross Mohn wrote: > Yes, I'd like to send these just to hackers@, where they belong Heyho Ross, I don't think hackers@ was the right choice. It was a support question, neither a patch nor a discussion about a proposed patch or even an actual bug report of a bug in dvtm. Your problem (getting cwd o

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread FRIGN
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:55:50 -0400 Ross Mohn wrote: > Yes, I'd like to send these just to hackers@, where they belong, but I > don't have any evidence that the maintainer is listening there yet. > There are no posts from him in the hackers@ archive. I guess I'll have > to only send them to dev@,

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread Ross Mohn
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:39:22PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:32:38 -0400 > Ross Mohn wrote: > > Hey Ross, > > > Hi > > please do not send these things to both ml's. People who are operating > on hackers@ most likely are also subscribed to dev@. > We didn't do the split to get

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread v4hn
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:32:38AM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote: > $ pstree -p 2199 > dvtm(2199)─┬─sh(2239)───bash(2240)───mutt(11096) >├─sh(2324)───bash(2325) >├─sh(12015)───bash(12016)───vim(17544) >└─sh(12116)───bash(12117)───pstree(21626) Fix y

Re: [dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread FRIGN
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:32:38 -0400 Ross Mohn wrote: Hey Ross, > Hi please do not send these things to both ml's. People who are operating on hackers@ most likely are also subscribed to dev@. We didn't do the split to get twin-mails. Either send it to one or the other. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN

[dev] [dvtm] create in $CWD not working

2015-07-15 Thread Ross Mohn
Hi, The create() function can take a third argument in order to use the directory of the current client, sel, when it creates a new client. This command is mapped to MOD+C by default. To implement this, the function uses the /proc/ tree to find the current directory of process sel->pid. The proble