On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:21:25 +0200
quinq wrote:
Hey Quinq,
> Here are the modifications for ls I made a while ago, I tried this
> time to separate them into different commits.
Thanks for your patches, I'll review them tomorrow. Please, next time,
send them to hackers@ though. ;)
Cheers
FRIGN
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:00:45PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:34:26 -0700
> > Added Google to the LICENSE to the copyright list to meet our legal
> > requirements.
>
> we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
> Adding a company to a license is a risk w
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Can you not get an exemption from your employer so you can freely contribute
> to this project under your own name?
It's possible, but does require more review. Given the trivial nature
of my patch, and the fact that Quentin already pr
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 01:22:08PM -0700, Matthew Wesley wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:00 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> > we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
> > Adding a company to a license is a risk we won't take.
> > We prefer to deny these patches in favor of stayi
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:00 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
> Adding a company to a license is a risk we won't take.
> We prefer to deny these patches in favor of staying away from possible
> risks of this nature, so please either commit th
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:34:26 -0700
Matthew Wesley wrote:
Hey Matthew,
> Added Google to the LICENSE to the copyright list to meet our legal
> requirements.
we had this discussion before and the reasons have already been told.
Adding a company to a license is a risk we won't take.
We prefer to d
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Evan Gates wrote:
> In most cases authors of small patches are not added to the LICENSE of
> suckless projects.
> -emg
Understandable, given the number of contributors of 3-line changes.
I've confirmed the corporate requirement for such a copyright line,
however.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Matthew Wesley wrote:
> Can you provide some of the history? Nothing in the st commit history
> showed a previous Google contribution. If previous patches were able
> to get through without a Google entry in LICENSE, I may be able to
> take that precedent to our o
Can you provide some of the history? Nothing in the st commit history
showed a previous Google contribution. If previous patches were able
to get through without a Google entry in LICENSE, I may be able to
take that precedent to our open source team.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Lee Fallat w
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Matthew Wesley wrote:
>
> Added Google to the LICENSE to the copyright list to meet our legal
> requirements.
> ---
> LICENSE | 1 +
> st.c| 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE
> index 1be82da..69ede9
The font size is actually a double and can have non-integer values when
fonts are specified in point size instead of pixel size. Update zoom
functions to preserve the fractional component in a float. Some small
precision is lost, but the zoom reset function gets very close to the
original size and
Quoth Ivan Tham:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:00:58PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:52:29PM +0800, Ivan Tham wrote:
> >>>There was a patch in mainline to support viewing images in st, but it
> >>>was removed; refer to c0a56ef4be2a0f84360f41b2d45964e7ef297746 and
> >>>c2026
12 matches
Mail list logo
