On 31 May 2015 at 23:24, Jack L. Frost wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 08:57:12PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> Well, GitHub is the sourceforge of the tens... so the most sucking
>> aspect about GitHub as of today is its content. Every hipster can host
>> his crapware there. And it feels like 9
Quoth Jack L. Frost on Mon, Jun 01 2015 00:24 +0300:
In other words: GitHub favors the quantity rather than the quality. It
is lacking a good portion of hygene in its open source handling.
So you want it to do quality control?
Good design enforces its own quality control.
No 'Fork' button on
Git (and other CVSs) are inherently decentralized. Don't use a service
like Github if you want a decentralized repository. Like someone else
was saying, torrenting involves people to seed, and when they don't
the torrent dies (in our case, a repository). This isn't what anyone
wants...
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 08:57:12PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Well, GitHub is the sourceforge of the tens... so the most sucking
> aspect about GitHub as of today is its content. Every hipster can host
> his crapware there. And it feels like 95% of all GitHub repos are
> actually some kind of h
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> The good thing about elite projects is, that only a bunch of people
> will actually clone per day ;)
>
...which stumps the argument about whether to implement bittorrent for
a bunch of clones per day. Bt's "decentral" design only makes sen
On 31 May 2015 at 17:00, Martti Kühne wrote:
> ...
>> Also what's wrong with git repos at a central project-related place?
>
> It's good thinking by OP, there's just too much traffic to host dwm
> everywhere if 100,000 people per minue are cloning.
Having 100k people cloning per minute is quite a
On 31 May 2015 at 17:53, Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
wrote:
> Quoth Anselm R Garbe on Sun, May 31 2015 16:53 +0200:
>>
>> What has suckless with github in common I wonder? I hope nothing
>> apart from using git.
>
>
> What do you find most sucking about GitHub? I'm curious.
Well, GitHub is the source
Sorry, messed up something about plain text. Here is my message:
What are the exact reasons why github is harmful? I use github, but if
there is anything wrong that I could not see till now, I would like to know
it. Or do you mean the community of github is bad?
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:17 P
What are the exact reasons why github is harmful? I use github, but if
there is anything wrong that I could not see till now, I would like to know
it. Or do you mean the community of github is bad?
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Aditya Goturu wrote:
> What are the exact reasons why github i
On Sun, 31 May 2015 21:09:25 +0800
Ivan Tham wrote:
Hi Ivan,
> I think that would make the projects in suckless more decentralized.
> I am just giving and idea but I still think the current system is
> better, using gittorrent may let the projects which are inspired by
> suckless work together i
When I execute a true color printf in st, I get a core dump. Command
in question (this is in bash):
printf "\e[38;2;255;255;255mTRUECOLOR"
I'm on git sha caa97cc781ccf29f28c3d9e6683a66eb3f70e2bd. CFLAGS were
the same as in the default config.mk, but with -O0. Config patch and
full backtrace attac
Anselm,
Quoth Anselm R Garbe on Sun, May 31 2015 16:53 +0200:
What has suckless with github in common I wonder? I hope nothing
apart from using git.
What do you find most sucking about GitHub? I'm curious.
Regards,
--
Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
> ...everywhere...
that should obviously git.suckless.org there. :-)
cheers!
mar77i
...
> Also what's wrong with git repos at a central project-related place?
>
It's good thinking by OP, there's just too much traffic to host dwm
everywhere if 100,000 people per minue are cloning.
cheers!
mar77i
On 31 May 2015 at 15:09, Ivan Tham wrote:
> http://blog.printf.net/articles/2015/05/29/announcing-gittorrent-a-decentralized-github/
>
> Hi, I think that would make the projects in suckless more decentralized.
> I am just giving and idea but I still think the current system is
> better, using gitt
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 03:31:42PM +0200, Teodoro Santoni wrote:
Rather not like the implementation in node javascript.
Yeah, I thought about that too. Implementing it in C.
--
_
< Do what you like, like what you do. >
-
I like the idea (git through bittorrent) a lot.
Rather not like the implementation in node javascript.
My humble opinion for your proposal is neither yes not no: this is a
distributed way to git-pull that can be built upon the classic git. So anyone
who would mirror a suckless project git into bt
http://blog.printf.net/articles/2015/05/29/announcing-gittorrent-a-decentralized-github/
Hi, I think that would make the projects in suckless more decentralized.
I am just giving and idea but I still think the current system is
better, using gittorrent may let the projects which are inspired by
s
18 matches
Mail list logo
