On 29 April 2015 at 16:58, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Julius Schmidt:
>> I am currently collecting funds for a production run of a Zynq based
>> board built specifically with Plan 9 in mind. It has a dual-core ARM
>> CPU and a Xilinx FPGA. We are running 9front, but labs and 9atom
>> would likely work fi
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Nick wrote:
> It totally does. Visit https://njw.me.uk and see the "U" in the SSL
> section of the status bar
Thanks. I did not notice this 'U'.
>> Change `static char *strictssl` to true and rebuild,
> I get a SSL handshake error if strictssl is true.
Sor
Hi Marc,
You really don't have to be such a twat about all this. Just offer
your suggestion without the unnecessary abrasiveness.
What I got from your link is that someone negatively compared your
work to sbase, and now you've got a bee in your bonnet over it. Are we
really going to have to put u
* Martti Kühne [2015-04-28 09:40]:
> The initial patch seems to cover edge cases I fail to grasp and
> probably doesn't cover all scenarios.
I've implemented URL selection into st, where I need to start dmenu and
the browser. See the patch attached. I'm open to push this one to the
wiki, but I th
Hi,
I'm personally in favour of using dup2. It is quite clear that
dup2(cmdfd, STDIN_FILENO) duplicates the fd into the position of
STDIN_FILENO. That's what it says. On the other hand, the combination
of close(STDIN_FILENO) and dup(cmdfd) is less efficient (two syscalls)
and also means that the r
> The symbol table does not matter too much in statically linked applications
> (and that's what's supposed to happen)
Oh $deity... :facepalm:
So you do all that work of extracting the function to avoid "duplicate
code"... just so the compiler can put it back the way it should've
been written in
Hi aiju,
Quoth Julius Schmidt:
> I am currently collecting funds for a production run of a Zynq based
> board built specifically with Plan 9 in mind. It has a dual-core ARM
> CPU and a Xilinx FPGA. We are running 9front, but labs and 9atom
> would likely work fine too.
That sounds cool. To ask a
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:58:26 -0300
Marc Collin wrote:
Hey Marc,
> If anything the amount of extra space you're taking up in the symbol
> table with an additional (imported) function call and the code of the
> putword function, for example, absolutely trivially stupid function is
> far more than
uh-huh
I am currently collecting funds for a production run of a Zynq based board
built specifically with Plan 9 in mind. It has a dual-core ARM CPU and a
Xilinx FPGA. We are running 9front, but labs and 9atom would likely work
fine too.
You can preorder it for $500, buy a glenda or aijuboard t-shirt
If anything the amount of extra space you're taking up in the symbol
table with an additional (imported) function call and the code of the
putword function, for example, absolutely trivially stupid function is
far more than just integrating the bloody thing into the source. It is
literally a compar
11 matches
Mail list logo
