On 1 April 2015 at 03:10, Markus Teich wrote:
> I already pinged (twice?) on the list and after a few weeks I asked Anselm in
> a
> private email, if he still has the time to maintain slock. No answer…
As mentioned, you will gain access rights today in order to get in the
patches suggested. I wi
>>So my non-ASCII characters look incorrect in your MUA because you're
>>stuck in an insane locale? Too bad. That pain is self-inflicted.
>
> Don't blame me, I'm not the one who created all those funky European accented
> characters, etc.
All these 'funky' characters predate to the first english
> > On 31 March 2015 at 00:13, Roger wrote:
> > > But anyways, think I made my point.
> >
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:17:48AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> > You did: you only care for whatever encoding you personally need over
> > there in America. Most of us, however, are from Europe, do ne
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:17:48AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>On 31 March 2015 at 00:13, Roger wrote:
>> But anyways, think I made my point.
>
>You did: you only care for whatever encoding you personally need over
>there in America. Most of us, however, are from Europe, do need UTF-8,
>and
David Phillips wrote:
> Shall I go ahead and push my patch regardless?
Heyho,
I already pinged (twice?) on the list and after a few weeks I asked Anselm in a
private email, if he still has the time to maintain slock. No answer…
Since my bugfix patch is also waiting: Maybe someone else has push a
>So my non-ASCII characters look incorrect in your MUA because you're
>stuck in an insane locale? Too bad. That pain is self-inflicted.
Don't blame me, I'm not the one who created all those funky European accented
characters, etc.
Just wait for ASCIII.
Really within the English language, there'
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:30:04AM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:09:41 -0400
>Roger wrote:
>
>Hey Roger,
>
>> I thought non-ASCII characters required 16 bits within UTF-8, versus just 8
>> bits for ASCII. Therefore more memory. More memory referencing, requires
>> more
>> proc
I have found a similar patch [1] submitted to the list about a month
before this one was. It does not fix the initial issue my patch set
out to solve (i.e. blanking the screen to the correct colour) but its
functionality is provided by my patch. Note that [1] does not show the
failure colour when i
Fix a bug where if a line, character or word count is zero, it's not
printed
---
wc.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/wc.c b/wc.c
index 0ff3b8d..0b196d8 100644
--- a/wc.c
+++ b/wc.c
@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ output(const char *str, size_t nc, size_t nl, size_
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:08:28 -0400
Greg Reagle wrote:
> I am a big fan of the ISO 8601 date format: today would be 2015-03-31.
> It sorts dates properly and goes from largest unit of time to smallest
> (year then month then day). I think it would be fine for the suckless
> tools to support only
Somebody wrote:
> > I agree there should be localized date-formats,
I am a big fan of the ISO 8601 date format: today would be 2015-03-31.
It sorts dates properly and goes from largest unit of time to smallest
(year then month then day). I think it would be fine for the suckless
tools to support
On 30 March 2015 at 20:33, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:05:19 +0200
> Markus Wichmann wrote:
>
>> How about simply calling setlocale()? Or was that too simple? If the
>> user has set a non-UTF-8 locale and then uses UTF-8, that's on them!
>
> POSIX locales are an insane concept. Unicode
12 matches
Mail list logo
