[dev] [st] [PATCH] Backspace value shouldn't depend on keypad state

--- config.def.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/config.def.h b/config.def.h index 5b985cd..28a413b 100644 --- a/config.def.h +++ b/config.def.h @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static Key key[] = { { XK_Delete,ShiftMask, "\033[3;2~",+1,0,0},

Re: [dev] st: selecting text affects both primary and clipbaord

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:18:49PM -0400, Greg Reagle wrote: > It could go the other way and do a variant of Ctrl+C for copy and Ctrl+V > for paste. I wouldn't use them directly because the programs running in > st probably need those keys. So Alt+Ctrl+C/V or Shitf+Ctrl+C/V or > Alt+C/V. > > Also

Re: [dev] st: selecting text affects both primary and clipbaord

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:18:49PM -0400, Greg Reagle wrote: > It could go the other way and do a variant of Ctrl+C for copy and Ctrl+V > for paste. I wouldn't use them directly because the programs running in > st probably need those keys. So Alt+Ctrl+C/V or Shitf+Ctrl+C/V or > Alt+C/V. > > Also

Re: [dev] Potential bug in st fallback font code

First, you say thanks for reporting the issue: On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:17:23PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Thanks for reporting this. > > Sincerely, > Christoph Lohmann Then you complain that I should send a patch with the bug: On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:39:49AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wordingy

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:57:54PM +1300, David Phillips wrote: > Out of interest, was this thread created anew on purpose? Did I miss the joke? I'm going to take a crack at this: in Mutt, "y" is the default key to send a message. I'm guessing he didn't realize he was in the subject field, attempt

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015, at 05:28 PM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: > OpenBSD lacks librt, despite it being mandatory in POSIX That is fine, but I think a little bit better would be: "OpenBSD lacks librt, even though librt is required by POSIX." -- http://www.fastmail.com - mmm... Fastma

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

> > I think this is what was originally intended: > > OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it *being* mandatory in POSIX > Uhmmm, I think you are rigth here. The correct sentence should be: OpenBSD lacks librt, despite it being mandatory in POSIX is it? (you guys know that my engl

Re: [dev] st: selecting text affects both primary and clipbaord

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015, at 05:02 PM, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > The text convinced me that st did it wrong. It is now using primary just > for the selection. Are there any good suggestions for the shortcut to > copy to the clipboard? Ctrl + y does interfere with everything. My two cents . . . It

Re: [dev] st: selecting text affects both primary and clipbaord

Christoph Lohmann wrote: > The text convinced me that st did it wrong. It is now using primary just for > the selection. Are there any good suggestions for the shortcut to copy to > the clipboard? Ctrl + y does interfere with everything. Heyho, some other terminal emulators use ctrl-shift-c an

Re: [dev] [st] Backspace is now Linux

Hi everybody, Le mardi 10 mars 2015 à 12:03:39, Christoph Lohmann a écrit : > St now has the Linux behaviour of Backspace as a default. Please change > your configuration back from not using any strange backspace hacks. > > From now on new rules apply: > > Backspace == \177 > Delete

Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] FAQ: fix wording

> ## I cannot compile st in OpenBSD > > -OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it begin mandatory in POSIX > +OpenBSD lacks of librt, despite it began to be mandatory in POSIX > > . Applied, with removing of 'of'. Re

Re: [dev] [tabbed] [PATCH] fix bug in unmanage: check if lastsel is initialized

Greetings. On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:24:17 +0100 Markus Teich wrote: > Heyho, > > Here you go. That fixed it for me. > > The -d was irrelevant in reproducing the problem, please provide minimal > reproduction testcases, when reporting bugs, the backgrounding is kind of > annoying to debug if you

Re: [dev] Potential bug in st fallback font code

Greetings. On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:19:53 +0100 Greg Reagle wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:39:49AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > > Why are you throwing half‐baked bug reports at me without doing any de‐ > > bugging on your own? First of all, this is suckless: Bug reports have to > > be o

Re: [dev] Potential bug in st fallback font code

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:02:12PM +0100, FRIGN wrote: > As much as I love hating pango, it's also the only > library I know of which handles assembled characters > properly. Actually, Xft handles combining characters just fine. With my dwm / libsl Xft patch, combined character sequences render pe

Re: [dev] Problems install st

On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:05:02 +0800 Ivan Tham wrote: > Off-topic question: What is the pros and cons of c and go language? > And the performance of their language. I must admit, Go almost cut it for me. It simplifies a lot of things, but it suffers from 2 major flaws: 1) Too much stuff is in the

Re: [dev] Potential bug in st fallback font code

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:39:49AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Why are you throwing half‐baked bug reports at me without doing any de‐ > bugging on your own? First of all, this is suckless: Bug reports have to > be opened with a patch attached. Second: Don’t reply to yourself if you > don’t

Re: [dev] Potential bug in st fallback font code

Quoth Connor Lane Smith: > I note that, had Eric not taken the time to post details of this bug > to the mailing list, we wouldn't have known about it, and the bug > would have lingered on. But apparently that's preferable. See no evil, > hear no evil! Sh! Christoph has his police everywh

[dev] [tabbed] [PATCH] fix bug in unmanage: check if lastsel is initialized

--- Heyho, Here you go. That fixed it for me. The -d was irrelevant in reproducing the problem, please provide minimal reproduction testcases, when reporting bugs, the backgrounding is kind of annoying to debug if you always have to attach to the running process with gdb. --Markus tabbed.c

Re: [dev] Potential bug in st fallback font code

Hi, I had a quick glance at Christoph's patch. An excerpt: + /* We got a default font for a not found glyph. */ + if(!charexists && frc[i].flags == frcflags \ + && unicodep == unicodep) { I invite you to contemplat

Re: [dev] Problems install st

Hi, I am still new to st and have no understanding about c language. On 3/9/15, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote: >> st build options: >> Package fontconfig was not found in the pkg-config search path. >> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `fontconfig.pc' >> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH e