> See attached :)
Brilliant, thanks very much.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 06:05:32PM +0100, ACE wrote:
> Maybe someone has a patch for this problem.
See attached :)
Eric
>From 731ad15396deb3872411189b613c5508d786392d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Pruitt
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 19:46:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Prevent rearrangement due to _N
I haven't bothered to look into the issue. But the same behaviour can
be seen in steam.
What I do is set the tag to Floating mode or just set the specific
windows to float.
Maybe someone has a patch for this problem.
No, right list, but I should have specified that I'm talking about dwm.
Sorry, wrong list.
Hi,
has anyone had any issues with Plasma 5 apps? I find that since
upgrading Gwenview if I click on it when it's in the dwm stack it jumps
to the master window position.
Thanks, Jamie
On 13 February 2015 at 09:56, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:41:08AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
>> This is not the case anymore in big commercial programs, but this is
>> far from the desired state. A modular approach, where you can assess
>> that each part works as expected, can
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:41:08AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> This is not the case anymore in big commercial programs, but this is
> far from the desired state. A modular approach, where you can assess
> that each part works as expected, can be way superior.
> If you make a change to a tool and can't be
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:41:08AM +0100, FRIGN wrote:
> I have a mixed opinion about test-environments. In my opinion, they
> become necessary when the developer can't grasp the complexity of his
> program and needs to check if certain vectors passed to his program
> result in the same output vect
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:23:58 +
Ralph Eastwood wrote:
Hey Ralph,
> Yeah I am reasonably confident after the last patch. Uuencode always
> worked but I had some issues on the uudecode in corner cases (Didn't
> flush the decoded stream in the right places). One of the three
> patches just remo
On 13 February 2015 at 09:12, FRIGN wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:43:06 +
> Ralph Eastwood wrote:
>
> Hey Ralph,
>
>> Attached is another patch for uudecode which I think works properly
>> now *cross fingers*.
>
> can we trust this code? Don't send a patch (or three patches) when you
> don'
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:43:06 +
Ralph Eastwood wrote:
Hey Ralph,
> Attached is another patch for uudecode which I think works properly
> now *cross fingers*.
can we trust this code? Don't send a patch (or three patches) when you
don't know if it is going to work.
Did you thoroughly test it w
12 matches
Mail list logo
