Re: [dev] [ii] [PATCH] keep nick synchronized with server

2015-01-26 Thread Truls Becken
Alternatively, /n could still send NICK, but not prematurely set the variable. -Truls On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Troy Sankey wrote: > Hi, > > If an error occurs changing nick (with /n) then it will become out of > sync with the server. Here are some of the consequences: > > * ii will log

Re: [dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy

2015-01-26 Thread tautolog
Hi Markus, I can certainly provide the code to consume that interface in a standalone patch with stubs. I am already in there, so I can commit to that. I have been looking at the filter format. The filter format is actually fairly complex. It supports regular expressions, and has features that

Re: [dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy

2015-01-26 Thread Nick
Quoth Nick: > I have a little shell script that deletes the .cookies file if no > surf instance is running, that is spawned from cron regularly. > I'll attach it. Attached. Note that I have different surf instances for tor and not tor browsing, which is what the different cookies.txt file is.

Re: [dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy

2015-01-26 Thread Markus Teich
tauto...@gmail.com wrote: > My patch adds a decidenavigation() callback, which is exactly where that > interface would need to be called. I can add it to my branch with minimal > effort, and even make a separate patch, but handling the dependency would need > to be done in a way that conforms to th

Re: [dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy

2015-01-26 Thread tautolog
Hi Markus, My patch adds a decidenavigation() callback, which is exactly where that interface would need to be called. I can add it to my branch with minimal effort, and even make a separate patch, but handling the dependency would need to be done in a way that conforms to the suckless philosop

Re: [dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy

2015-01-26 Thread Markus Teich
Ben Woolley wrote: > It won't solve the problem of reducing ads, focusing on privacy. You could > probably use a hosts file or something to block most of the ads. Heyho, Basic adblocking can easily be done with the /etc/hosts file[0]. However I also plan to adapt the recent jumanji[1] adblock.[ch

Re: [dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy

2015-01-26 Thread Nick
Hi Greg, Quoth Greg Reagle: > There are a few Firefox extensions that I've come to rely on. What do > you use or what do you suggest that I use to provide the functionality > of the following Firefox extensions: > > Adblock Plus for blocking ads, see https://adblockplus.org/ > > Privacy Badger

Re: [dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy

2015-01-26 Thread Ben Woolley
Hi Greg, Please review my work with surf on origin isolation to satisfy the same-origin policy. It doesn't block ads, but it prevents tracking by storing all cookies and cache per first-party origin website. The latest patch also adds some noise to headers to interfere with browser profiling. It

Re: [dev] surf: documented indicators in man page

2015-01-26 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:58:46 +0100 Greg Reagle wrote: > Patch attached. Thanks for sending the patch, it has been applied. I extended the de‐ scription a bit. Sincerely, Christoph Lohmann

[dev] surf alternatives for Adblock Plus, Privacy Badger, Self-Destructing Cookies, BetterPrivacy

2015-01-26 Thread Greg Reagle
Hello. I am trying surf instead of Firefox (which I've used for very many years). So far so good. The difference in memory usage is amazing. There are a few Firefox extensions that I've come to rely on. What do you use or what do you suggest that I use to provide the functionality of the follo

[dev] surf: documented indicators in man page

2015-01-26 Thread Greg Reagle
Patch attached. -- http://www.fastmail.com - The professional email service 0001-Documented-indicators.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [dev] [ubase][PATCH] Fix df hanging when statvfs() fails.

2015-01-26 Thread Dimitris Papastamos
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 08:53:14PM +0200, Risto Salminen wrote: > Now df prints out an appropriate error message when statvfs() fails > instead of just hanging. Also make df return 1 when statvfs() fails. Thanks, applied!

[dev] [ubase][PATCH] Fix df hanging when statvfs() fails.

2015-01-26 Thread Risto Salminen
Now df prints out an appropriate error message when statvfs() fails instead of just hanging. Also make df return 1 when statvfs() fails. --- df.c | 17 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/df.c b/df.c index f14b56b..f3a3049 100644 --- a/df.c +++ b/df.c @

Re: [dev] pseudo-problem copying and pasting

2015-01-26 Thread Greg Reagle
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015, at 06:26 AM, Vampyrah Broadcasting wrote: > It was me. Could you hint me to that post? Are you aware that: 1) You can use the middle mouse button to paste after hitting Ctrl-y in surf, and that requires no change to surf? 2) You can right click on a link in surf and a pop-up

Re: [dev] Found a bug in surf

2015-01-26 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:37:44 +0100 Vampyrah Broadcasting wrote: > It crashed again. 919 segmentation fault. You are not really helping. Don’t spam this mailinglist. Compile your webkit using debug symbols, scan the backtrace and decide on your own, if it’s surf or webkit. The

Re: [dev] Found a bug in surf

2015-01-26 Thread Vampyrah Broadcasting
It crashed again. 919 segmentation fault. 2015-01-25 15:02 GMT+01:00 Brandon Mulcahy : > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41:37PM +0100, Vampyrah Broadcasting wrote: >> With what command can I open the web console in uzbl? > > The Uzbl documentation is the place to find the answer that question, > not t

Re: [dev] [ii] Patch to use ii with UCSPI backend

2015-01-26 Thread Jan Klemkow
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > Hi, > * Markus Teich [2015-01-22 14:30]: > > younix wrote: > > > I don't get the point with an additional git branch!? What would be the > > > advantage of it, instead of a diff on the website? How would it look > > > like if > > > y

Re: [dev] [ii] Patch to use ii with UCSPI backend

2015-01-26 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Markus Teich [2015-01-22 14:30]: > younix wrote: > > I don't get the point with an additional git branch!? What would be the > > advantage of it, instead of a diff on the website? How would it look like > > if > > you made the next release of ii? > > After a new official release or just