Hi!
I noticed that lsw in repo has its version bumped in 2011, and no new
commits went in since. Provided that current master is much more useful
then lsw-0.2, I wanted to ask someone commit access to tag lsw-0.3 and
add it to downloads, so that it could be packaged for distros.
--
Dmitrij D. C
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014, at 05:29 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> Frankly, we don't need yet another discussion on a topic like this.
Thank you for your feedback. I wasn't trying to start a *discussion*,
but as it was listed on http://suckless.org/project_ideas, I wanted to
see whether there would actually be su
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014, at 05:18 PM, Bobby Powers wrote:
> To be clear - I don't support rewriting system utilities in Go. *base
> are starting to look nice, and statically link down to a very small
> size. I don't see any wins in rewriting these in Go.
Thank you for your feedback. This seems to
On 25/11/2014, Markus Teich wrote:
> Please post the output of
>
> ldd $(which ls); du -h $(which ls)
$ ldd $(which ls); du -h $(which ls)
mksh: ldd: not found
0 /usr/bin/ls
$ ls -l /usr/bin/ls
lrwxrwxrwx1 strake users7 Aug 25 2013 /usr/bin/ls -> busybox
$ du -h /usr/bin/
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:18:39 -0500
Bobby Powers wrote:
> To be clear - I don't support rewriting system utilities in Go. *base
> are starting to look nice, and statically link down to a very small
> size. I don't see any wins in rewriting these in Go.
Yeah, I sign this. We are currently workin
Hello,
Gregor Best wrote:
> While Uriel certainly was one of the loudest proponents of... anything
> Uriel proposed, I don't think he was the only one who found Go interesting
> and good.
I as well find Go interesting and good.
> I wouldn't use it for coreutils though, mostly because of the ridi
M Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> Dynamic-linked system utilities, *barf*
Please post the output of
ldd $(which ls); du -h $(which ls)
--Markus
Silvan Jegen wrote:
> I rather like Go but I may be the exception.
You're not, me too.
> The binary size was my concern as well (Go binaries are big since they are
> statically linked)
Yes they are, but this should not be a big problem, since big memory costs small
amounts of money nowadays.
--
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:11:14PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 25 November 2014 at 14:08, Greg Reagle wrote:
> > From http://suckless.org/project_ideas:
> >> Write the most useful unix userland commands in the new Go language
> >> created by Google to form a robust base for future Unix-like
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:23:03PM +, Nick wrote:
>> Quoth Charlie Kester:
>
> The hackers list is not interesting for reviewing patches per se because
> at that point they have already been applied.
>
> It is mostly for providing
On 25/11/2014, Jean-Christophe Petkovich wrote:
> When they are dynamically linked, they are small enough for my tastes.
Dynamic-linked system utilities, *barf*
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:08:48PM -0500, Greg Reagle wrote:
> From http://suckless.org/project_ideas:
> > Write the most useful unix userland commands in the new Go language
> > created by Google to form a robust base for future Unix-like
> > userlands that do not suffer from the vulnerabilities t
On 25 November 2014 at 14:22, Jean-Christophe Petkovich
wrote:
> ~ $ rustc hello-world.rs -o hello-world -C prefer-dynamic
using -C lto might also yield smaller binaries
Gregor Best writes:
> How big are Rust binaries on average? Comparable to something C-like, or
> Go-like?
When they are dynamically linked, they are small enough for my tastes.
~ $ cat hello-world.rs
fn main() {
println!("Hello World!")
}
~ $ rustc hello-worl
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:11:14PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> [...]
> I don't think anyone here supports Go. I could be wrong but I think
> Uriel was the only real supporter in the community.
> [...]
While Uriel certainly was one of the loudest proponents of... anything
Uriel proposed, I don'
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:11:14PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> I don't think anyone here supports Go. I could be wrong but I think
> Uriel was the only real supporter in the community. I would be more
> interested in a Rust implementation of coreutils however. It might
> have already been done
On 25 November 2014 at 14:08, Greg Reagle wrote:
> From http://suckless.org/project_ideas:
>> Write the most useful unix userland commands in the new Go language
>> created by Google to form a robust base for future Unix-like
>> userlands that do not suffer from the vulnerabilities that are
>> com
>From http://suckless.org/project_ideas:
> Write the most useful unix userland commands in the new Go language
> created by Google to form a robust base for future Unix-like
> userlands that do not suffer from the vulnerabilities that are
> common in C or C++ code.
Is anyone still interested in th
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:19:15PM -0600, Josh Lawrence wrote:
> I'm curious to know what flavor of *nix people on this list use on a
> day-to-day basis.
Debian and Alpine (in containers) on servers, my own Arch spinoff[1] on
desktops. Arch has a huge software library and provides all the tools to
On 11/24, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Charlie Kester:
> > If there are enough people who want to keep this dev list restricted to
> > discussion of proposed patches or other concrete work on suckless
> > projects, perhaps there should be a separate list for more general
> > discussion?
>
> No, I think m
This thread is the usual meta-OT we keep running into here because
somebody's sarcasm detector had failed them. How can you even get up
in the morning without philosophical justification?
21 matches
Mail list logo
