"> Furthermore, many of you, guys, are living close to Munich or in Germany.
Exactly that's the damn point I was trying to make the whole time. Why don't
we decide NOW on where the conference should be instead of limiting ourselves
to some poll that was made a few years ago?"
fair point
2014-11-
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:43:07 +0100
patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> You travel to Budapest by car. And, you get your car stolen.
> No no no. Budapest isn't a great idea.
> Munich is far better and you are in a peaceful place and country. Less
> dangerous to lose money by being stolen.
> Alth
where are you from? (I need to check/maintain my prejudices)
On 11/22/14, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> fair point.
>
> You travel to Budapest by car. And, you get your car stolen.
> No no no. Budapest isn't a great idea.
> Munich is far better and you are in a peaceful place and country.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:43:07AM +0100, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> You travel to Budapest by car. And, you get your car stolen.
> No no no. Budapest isn't a great idea.
> Munich is far better and you are in a peaceful place and country. Less
> dangerous to lose money by being stolen.
D
fair point.
You travel to Budapest by car. And, you get your car stolen.
No no no. Budapest isn't a great idea.
Munich is far better and you are in a peaceful place and country. Less
dangerous to lose money by being stolen.
Although slightly more expensive, the food quality in Germany is better.
On 22 November 2014 11:14, FRIGN wrote:
> Okay, I'll trust you in this regard. ;) So what's the best way to travel
> to Budapest? By bus, train, car?
The day we fix the actual conference date, then go ahead to book a
cheap flight. All other options will be marginally cheaper, but much
more time c
On 19 November 2014 20:53, wrote:
>
>> Was there as reason or did the user trolls attending the last one
>> just have fun pissing off most of the suckless-contributors?
>> There's no reason to have a conference in Budapest when most people
>> come from a completely different part of the world.
>>
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:08:39 +0100
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Hey Anselm,
> The reason is the rotation principle. We agree on the next location at
> each conference.
> We will do that to define the place the 3rd conference.
Fair point.
> Nobody of the other attendees want's to spent a fortune eithe
On 19 November 2014 21:06, FRIGN wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:00:46 +0100
> Markus Teich wrote:
>
>> I'm living near Munich, but Budapest would also be ok. I've been there this
>> summer and it's not even close to the expensiveness of Munich. This could
>> even
>> out the higher travelling co
On 19 November 2014 19:33, FRIGN wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:35:12 +0100
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
>> It was agreed upon and dictated at the first slcon, that the next is
>> to be held in Budapest.
>
> Was there as reason or did the user trolls attending the last one
> just have fun pissing o
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:28:19 -0800
Evan Gates wrote:
> Notice there's no mention of ASCII, so bytes 0x80 to 0xFF are valid.
> For sbase we want UTF-8 support. Should we assume/enforce only valid
> UTF-8? Doing so makes a lot of coding easier and less sucky, but means
> that some POSIX text files
11 matches
Mail list logo
