> I am personally not opposed to using yacc. Yeah I like hand-rolled
> recursive descent parsers are cool but yacc is a standard tool that
> most people are familiar with.
>
> Roberto, what do you think?
I agree with you. I think yacc is a suckless tool, and I am sure we will
have to use it for
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 23:36:11 +0100
patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> I would like to ask you when is planned the next conference in Munich
> on suckless / future of Linux / autoconf insanity / networking / ...
> terminal geek apps / C coding / happy hacking / happy penguin(s) ...
> (maybe happy
I fixed a few bugs and tried to sbaseify the new expr. I've attached a
patch. Please let me know if I need to make any more changes.
Make sure to look at the differences in the Makefile before deciding
to apply. I'm not convinced I did it the best way, but it is working.
Besides the changes I made
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:35:52PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > > There is the http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page
> >
> > llvm/clang is worse
Dear Members,
I would like to ask you when is planned the next conference in Munich
on suckless / future of Linux / autoconf insanity / networking / ...
terminal geek apps / C coding / happy hacking / happy penguin(s) ...
(maybe happy dolphins too <- joke).
Greetings,
Pat'
Noticed that sbase-box always exits with status 0, here's a patch to fix it.
-emg
From 9d3a6360da393cf3261462e31c8285a56afbcf78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Evan Gates
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:12:13 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] return exit status of command in sbase-box
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file
If I fflush it, it works, but that seems hacky
On 7 November 2014 13:28, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> folks,
>
> I can't grep this program. I do not know why... Any ideas?
>
> On 7 November 2014 05:49, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:40:03AM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote:
>>>
folks,
I can't grep this program. I do not know why... Any ideas?
On 7 November 2014 05:49, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:40:03AM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote:
>>
>> >> > * Use strtonum() or estrtol() from sbase instead of atoi().
>> >>
>> >> I agree here if the string
On 7 November 2014 13:12, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:08:47 -0500
> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>
>> is that different or the same as the kickstarter assassination award?
>
> How did you know we have a hitlist? :O
>
I am in the inner sanctum
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:08:47 -0500
Calvin Morrison wrote:
> is that different or the same as the kickstarter assassination award?
How did you know we have a hitlist? :O
--
FRIGN
koneu wrote:
You disgust me.
You are an official nominee for the 2014 suckless award.
Stay tuned!
Cheers
FRIGN
Shouldn't that be the 2014 suckless-less award?
Someone's logic is clearly in question.
is that different or the same as the kickstarter assassination award?
On 7 November 2014 13:07, FRIGN wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 18:37:04 +0100
> koneu wrote:
>
>> You disgust me.
>
> You are an official nominee for the 2014 suckless award.
> Stay tuned!
>
> Cheers
>
> FRIGN
>
> --
> FRIGN
>
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 18:37:04 +0100
koneu wrote:
> You disgust me.
You are an official nominee for the 2014 suckless award.
Stay tuned!
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN
Hey...I try. :D
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:37 AM, koneu wrote:
>
> You disgust me.
>
I am also a very happy daily user of dvtm and I recommend it. I use it
like such:
dtach -A ~/dtach-socket -z -r winch dvtm -M
I used tmux before dvtm. I didn't have any real problems with tmux, but
I like dvtm better because I find tmux to be too elaborate, too many
options, too many keybind
On November 6, 2014 6:34:17 PM CET, Louis Santillan wrote:
>There is one case where C++ style comment create a useful feature that
>I
>don't believe C style comments are able to replicate. Some might
>disagree.
>In a color syntax highlighting editor in a C99 codebase, you can prefix
>C
>style com
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:02:02PM -0500, Greg Reagle wrote:
> I neglected to mention the Heirloom Toolchest at
> http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/tools.html as another alternative.
http://git.2f30.org/hbase/
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014, at 11:56 AM, Greg Reagle wrote:
> > I infer from the existence of
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:56:23 -0500
Greg Reagle wrote:
> I infer from the existence of sbase and ubase that the other
> alternatives that already exist (e.g. busybox, toybox, GNU) are
> considered too full of suck. Is that right?
There are always certain levels of suckness. Busybox for instance i
On 11/07/2014 04:54 AM, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Marc André Tanner wrote:
>> The copy mode, allowing you to move around in the scroll back buffer
>> history, selecting text and then later pasting it into different
>> windows was rewritten. It now works by
I neglected to mention the Heirloom Toolchest at
http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/tools.html as another alternative.
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014, at 11:56 AM, Greg Reagle wrote:
> I infer from the existence of sbase and ubase that the other
> alternatives that already exist (e.g. busybox, toybox, GNU) are
I infer from the existence of sbase and ubase that the other
alternatives that already exist (e.g. busybox, toybox, GNU) are
considered too full of suck. Is that right?
I would guess that the GNU utilities are considerd too bloated. What
are the perceived shortcomings of busybox and toybox? What
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:35:52PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> > There is the http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page
>
> llvm/clang is worse than gcc as it's from the start a massive c++ kludge. At
> least with gcc u
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:30:20AM +0100, Silvan Jegen wrote:
> There is the http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/Main_Page
llvm/clang is worse than gcc as it's from the start a massive c++ kludge. At
least with gcc until its version 4.7, you can bootstrap its compilation with a
C "only" comp
Resending with correct author field this time. Sorry for the mismatch.
>From fef3c85bee5b849a7598107253bd46d03fa2143a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sin
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:20:13 +
Subject: [PATCH] No need to call endpwent()
---
slock.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --gi
Can you try the attached patch?
>From 631f6c0640e08fea09fa5394e0ef84c7d6646b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitris Papastamos
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:20:13 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] No need to call endpwent()
---
slock.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/slock.c b/slock.
Can you print out `pws' in readpw() on stderr and check the logs?
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:40:03AM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote:
>
> >> > * Use strtonum() or estrtol() from sbase instead of atoi().
> >>
> >> I agree here if the string comes from the user. If the string
> >> is an internal string then there is no problem with atoi.
> >
> > It is generally unl
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:27:35AM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote:
> >> I disagree, check the size before of calling strcpy. If you want to
> >> avoid security risk you also have to check the output of strlcpy
> >> to detect truncations, so you don't win anything. In both cases
> >> you have to add a
>> > * Use strtonum() or estrtol() from sbase instead of atoi().
>>
>> I agree here if the string comes from the user. If the string
>> is an internal string then there is no problem with atoi.
>
> It is generally unlikely that the string has been validated to
> be an integer before getting to a
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:00:32PM -0800, Evan Gates wrote:
> I saw in sbase's TODO that expr had been imported from OpenBSD and
> needed "replacing or cleaning up." I decided to give it a try with
> yacc. It turned out very different from what I expected due to the
> need to convert between string
>> I disagree, check the size before of calling strcpy. If you want to
>> avoid security risk you also have to check the output of strlcpy
>> to detect truncations, so you don't win anything. In both cases
>> you have to add a comparision, so it is better to use strcpy that
>> is standard.
>
> Goo
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:03:01AM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote:
>
> > - Rename volatile bool q = false; to "isrunning".
>
> is.* is a reserved name space, it have not to be used in external scope.
>
>
> > - Use the safer strlcpy or snprintf instead of strcpy().
>
> I disagree, check the size
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:05:43AM +0100, k...@shike2.com wrote:
>
> > * Use strtonum() or estrtol() from sbase instead of atoi().
>
> I agree here if the string comes from the user. If the string
> is an internal string then there is no problem with atoi.
It is generally unlikely that the strin
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:03 AM, wrote:
>
>> - Rename volatile bool q = false; to "isrunning".
>
> is.* is a reserved name space, it have not to be used in external scope.
>
>
>> - Use the safer strlcpy or snprintf instead of strcpy().
>
> I disagree, check the size before of calling strcpy. If yo
- Original Message -
> From: "Silvan Jegen"
> To: "dev mail list"
> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 11:34:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [dev] slock segfault on rhel7
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Johan Guldmyr wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Dmitrij D. Czarkoff"
>>> To
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Marc André Tanner wrote:
> The copy mode, allowing you to move around in the scroll back buffer
> history, selecting text and then later pasting it into different
> windows was rewritten. It now works by piping the whole history to
> your $EDITOR and whatev
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Johan Guldmyr wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Dmitrij D. Czarkoff"
>> To: "dev mail list"
>> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 10:13:04 AM
>> Subject: Re: [dev] slock segfault on rhel7
>
>> Johan Guldmyr said:
>>> Output: https://pastee.org/35jas
>>
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:56:55PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:40:56PM +, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 04:38:20PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>> > > On a personnal level,
- Original Message -
> From: "Dmitrij D. Czarkoff"
> To: "dev mail list"
> Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 10:13:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [dev] slock segfault on rhel7
> Johan Guldmyr said:
>> Output: https://pastee.org/35jas
>
> You should try building it with "-g" in CFLAGS.
CFLAGS = -st
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 01:23:30 +0100
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> You are now added to the kickstarter.com assassination objective [1].
>
> From Russia with love,
> Putin
I'm all busy with Poettering and Stallman at the moment, but I added
Sylvain to the list now.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN
Johan Guldmyr said:
> Output: https://pastee.org/35jas
You should try building it with "-g" in CFLAGS.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
41 matches
Mail list logo
