On 10/25/14 13:41, F Hssn wrote:
Following suckless's minimal philosophy, I'd be interested to find out
if someone has done analysis on how an even minimal browser could be
developed in terms of SLOC, since webkit (r172694) stands at ~2
million lines, 75% of which is C++, while webkitgtk-1.10.2 i
Hi suckless! First, thanks for st. Been using it for a long while,
still impressed at how it gets a lot of stuff right - stuff that urxvt
failed miserably at. There's only one issue that has been bothering me
particularly.
The issue itself:
Unicode characters added since unicode 5.2 (released in
Seems like you deviated a bit from the thread subject.
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 01:00:05 +0300 Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> > I though about system wide font enlargement or passing other
> > resolution to X11 (possible?).
>
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:41:15AM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> You are close. The _real_ way to do it is set the DPI in xorg.conf
Or avoid to
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 01:00:05 +0300
Dimitris Zervas wrote:
>
Refer to this:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/xorg#Display_size_and_DPI
--
FRIGN
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 01:00:05 +0300
Dimitris Zervas wrote:
> Any ideas?
> I though about system wide font enlargement or passing other resolution to
> X11 (possible?).
You are close. The _real_ way to do it is set the DPI in xorg.conf and enlargen
the default
font size. That's exactly what Appl
2014-10-25 19:56 GMT-02:00 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe
:
>Any _popular_
> reboot would have to require people to change very little about
> their habits, and to do no hard thinking about the nature of the
> Web--if possible, no thinking at all.
It doesn't need to be popular at first; it needs to be co
Hello,
I just bought my macbook pro retina 13".
I am running Gentoo fairly well (a bit power hungry, I am open to suggestions,
especially fan control).
The main problem is the resolution. If I downscale with xrandr, it does bitmap
scales so the fonts are horrible.
Any ideas?
I though about syste
Quoth Daniel Camolês on Sat, Oct 25 2014 16:29 -0200:
When the choice you have is between 500k or 2 million lines of
code, it hurts to call anything suckless. I think the web needs
a serious reboot.
[snip]
But when it comes to application distribution... I know that we
have ssh and mainframe te
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 06:12:29PM -0200, Daniel Camolês wrote:
> The problem is not with this specific organization.
I meant w3c as w3crap, as in all things www-related (sons of sgml, js, css,
rdf, ...), not as the consortium, which imho isn't that much evil either: it
has only the misfortune t
>> Am I alone? Is there any hope out there?
>
> TL;DR: Imho, there is none. W3c is the total opposite of suckless software.
The problem is not with this specific organization. Design by
committee is the source of the evil. Everybody wants to put a shiny
new feature in there. Also, you never want t
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 04:29:58PM -0200, Daniel Camolês wrote:
> [snip]
> I dream with the day when the Internet will be built
> around a model simple and generic enough that a reasonable programmer
> will be able to code a complete "browser" in a month of work or so.
>
> Am I alone? Is there any
> No, that was not what I was talking about. In this browser discussion,
> I am not interested in ways to understand complexity as your proposed
> solution. I think the fact that the browser needs to be this huge is a
> signal that things are very, very wrong, and a new solution for
> application d
2014-10-25 16:59 GMT-02:00 Kartik Agaram :
>> Am I alone? Is there any hope out there?
>
> I'm working on this problem. I think the solution is white-box testing
> from the ground up, so that software encodes not just the rules about
> what to do but the specific scenarios that the programmer consi
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 04:29:58PM -0200, Daniel Camolês wrote:
> When the choice you have is between 500k or 2 million lines of code,
> it hurts to call anything suckless. I think the web needs a serious
> reboot. It started out as a markup language for presentation-only, and
> then it was morphed
> Am I alone? Is there any hope out there?
I'm working on this problem. I think the solution is white-box testing
from the ground up, so that software encodes not just the rules about
what to do but the specific scenarios that the programmer considered.
Because we only encode rules and not intenti
When the choice you have is between 500k or 2 million lines of code,
it hurts to call anything suckless. I think the web needs a serious
reboot. It started out as a markup language for presentation-only, and
then it was morphed through a convoluted series of additions into an
application distributi
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Quentin Rameau wrote:
> Hi, I tried to port surf for the webkit2 (WebKitGTK 2.6 / GTK3), here
> is the code:
> git://quinq.eu.org/surf2
> There will be some bugs, feel free to try it, feedback welcomed.
Noob question (joined the list a couple months ago),
Since s
Hi,
in WebKit2 API, there is
webkit_web_context_allow_tls_certificate_for_host() [1]. Maybe that
can help you.
But I think that certificates aren't directly handled by WebKit and
you should manage them with other tools for your users.
[1]:
http://webkitgtk.org/reference/webkit2gtk/2.4.2/WebKitWe
19 matches
Mail list logo
