Re: [dev] [st][PATCH] Add support for utmp in st (DISREGARD LAST)

2014-10-13 Thread k0ga
> Because that is the character sent by the key in this position with this > expected function (i.e. the also, for better or worse, what modern linux systems have standardized > on (I haven't done a survey of bsd, solaris, etc). Linux has not standardized anything. POSIX is the standard. You c

Re: [dev] [st][PATCH] Add support for utmp in st (DISREGARD LAST)

2014-10-13 Thread random832
Sorry I accidentally hit shift-enter and apparently that makes my email client send. On Mon, Oct 13, 2014, at 14:38, k...@shike2.com wrote: > But, why do you think is better DELETE than BACKSPACE? Because that is the character sent by the key in this position with this expected function (i.e. the

Re: [dev] [st][PATCH] Add support for utmp in st

2014-10-13 Thread random832
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014, at 14:38, k...@shike2.com wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014, at 14:32, k...@shike2.com wrote: > > That doesn't mean that the question of what the default should be is not > > worth discussing. > > Default configuration was discussed here some time ago, and suckless > develope

Re: [dev] [st][PATCH] Add support for utmp in st

2014-10-13 Thread k0ga
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014, at 14:32, k...@shike2.com wrote: > That doesn't mean that the question of what the default should be is not > worth discussing. Default configuration was discussed here some time ago, and suckless developers agreed with current configuration. Both options, Backspace genera

Re: [dev] [st][PATCH] Add support for utmp in st

2014-10-13 Thread random832
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014, at 14:32, k...@shike2.com wrote: > If the user doesn't like the key assignation on st he is free of changing > it > in his config.h (maybe we could add it to the FAQ). That doesn't mean that the question of what the default should be is not worth discussing. > > You didn't c