[dev] Re: [sic] [PATCH] Classic Suckless config.{def,}.h configurability

2014-09-30 Thread Eric Pruitt
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 07:31:09PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > I just noticed that "%F" support in strftime is a C99 feature, and if > sic is targeting C89, it should be changed to "%Y-%m-%d". Today I learned that "//" comments are apparently not valid C89, either. I've attached a revised patch th

Re: [dev] [sic] [PATCH] Treat non-option arguments as commands

2014-09-30 Thread Eric Pruitt
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:29:26PM +0200, Truls Becken wrote: > This should do what you want. The latter example depends on a shell extension, > but process substitution is such a nice idea it should be in all shells, IMHO. I think that still has the same problem mentioned in my other email: the r

[dev] Re: [sic] [PATCH] Classic Suckless config.{def,}.h configurability

2014-09-30 Thread Truls Becken
The patch seems like a good idea. +1 for "%Y-%m-%d" as well. -Truls

Re: [dev] [sic] [PATCH] Treat non-option arguments as commands

2014-09-30 Thread Truls Becken
Hi, Did you try something like: cat ~/.sicrc - | sic or cat <(echo ":j #suckless") - | sic This should do what you want. The latter example depends on a shell extension, but process substitution is such a nice idea it should be in all shells, IMHO. -Truls

Re: [dev] [RFC] Design of a vim like text editor

2014-09-30 Thread Marc André Tanner
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:58:11PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:36:12PM +0200, Marc André Tanner wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 06:12:30PM +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 08:03:45PM +0200, ale rimoldi wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > - 'J' in vi

[dev] Re: [sic] [PATCH] Treat non-option arguments as commands

2014-09-30 Thread Eric Pruitt
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:30:20PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: > sic.c | 24 +--- I noticed this implementation doesn't always work with every server -- the patch needs to be modified to have the option to allow the server to respond with the initial connection information / MO

Re: [dev] A new FIFO based tox client

2014-09-30 Thread Dimitris Papastamos
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:21:53PM +0100, Nick wrote: > How does that sound? I'm tempted to hack something together, so > feedback would be very welcome. Please keep in mind that we have not yet written an external client on top of the FIFO interface. It is likely that some important bits are mi