I feel honored and desecrated for suckless.
But somebody obviously spent google's paid time on this and had,
therefore, to note so in the license... xD
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:42:25PM +0200, Truls Becken wrote:
> - openlog(argv[0], LOG_CONS | LOG_PID, LOG_DAEMON);
> + openlog(argv[0], LOG_CONS | LOG_PID, LOG_CRON);
Good catch! Applied.
---
crond.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/crond.c b/crond.c
index d416ece..2dbbb76 100644
--- a/crond.c
+++ b/crond.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[])
TAILQ_INIT(&ctabhead);
if (dflag == 1) {
- openlog(argv[0], L
> I don't see Ari whining over this, so why would you care? If you care about
> the project and the direction it is taking, then start a technical discussion
> or
> even better demonstrate your ideas with patches!
>
> I am not here to satisfy all your needs or even provide context that I deem
>
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Alex-P. Natsios wrote:
> Plus i have yet to see anyone use dmenu in that way.
They can’t in the first place.
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 08:31:11PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>
>
> I don't know about you guys but I don't want Google to infest the
> license. Michal, either you join the license with your name only or
> forget about the patch.
> I've had very bad experiences with big companies having
> licensing-
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 14:31:56 -0400
Lee Fallat wrote:
> I was actually going to ask about this too but held back; I'm assuming
> that this patch will never be merged and people will only see that if
> they apply this patch...
And this is perfectly right! It's important to raise this issue.
If you
I was actually going to ask about this too but held back; I'm assuming
that this patch will never be merged and people will only see that if
they apply this patch...
What I was going to say:
> A little off-topic here, but why was there a need to put:
> +© 2014 Google Inc.
> In the licence?...(just
On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 20:19:15 +0200
Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Add a “-c” option which enables tab-completion for file-names. With
> it enabled, when entered text contains multiple words (for example
> “soffice docs”) or contains a slash (for example “~/bin”), pressing
> C-i or Tab will expand th
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 08:19:15PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> +© 2014 Google Inc. // author: Michal Nazarewicz
You should already have elaborated on this. Do it now.
Kind regards,
-Alex
Add a “-c” option which enables tab-completion for file-names. With
it enabled, when entered text contains multiple words (for example
“soffice docs”) or contains a slash (for example “~/bin”), pressing
C-i or Tab will expand the last argument as a file name.
If there were multiple expansions the
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 09:33:29AM -0500, Bigby James wrote:
> I can't speak for Dzen, but the wording of your first message in the thread
> gave
> me the same impression. We basically have two messages in the discussion
> thread
> to work with: One from the original author anouncing the project,
On 07/06, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:30:25PM +0200, Džen wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > > I've forked scron[0] [...]
> >
> > Why fork scron if you could just provide useful patches to the original
> > author?
>
> Why do yo
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Džen wrote:
> Yes. That's why I was asking, I wanted to know the reason.
It was purely because the original author did not feel like having
duplicate code around, which I explained in my first e-mail. He was not
going to drive the project in a different d
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> If you had, you would have seen that I already had merged ~20 patches
> into the original repo which renders your question useless.
Why useless? I was just wondering about the actual reason. I pulled
scron from the original repo to try
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Džen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > And please next time look at the actually git history of the project
> > before you jump in talking bs.
> I did look at the git history, this doesn't change the reason why I
> w
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> And please next time look at the actually git history of the project
> before you jump in talking bs.
I did look at the git history, this doesn't change the reason why I
was asking. I was just wondering. Jump in talking bullshit. Yeah,
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:30:25PM +0200, Džen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > I've forked scron[0] [...]
>
> Why fork scron if you could just provide useful patches to the original
> author?
And please next time look at the actually git history of the p
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:30:25PM +0200, Džen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> > I've forked scron[0] [...]
>
> Why fork scron if you could just provide useful patches to the original
> author?
Why do you assume that?
I made a number of patches, I notifie
19 matches
Mail list logo
