Re: [dev] [surf] WebKit1 deprecated

2014-05-28 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Nick writes: > Quoth YpN: > > About netsurf, yeah why not. But it lacks some properties IMHO. > > One of my friend tried to run a CSS2 website from me and the support > > was horrible, despite the care applied to the code. > > CSS2 support isn't complete. > > Probably. There isn't javascript supp

Re: [dev] [surf] WebKit1 deprecated

2014-05-28 Thread Nick
Quoth YpN: > Few months ago, I saw that webkitnix[1] was dropped. But the last > commit isn't too old, it seems to be still updated sometimes. > Maybe it could become really interesting for us. Yeah, I was sad to see it was dropped. The problem is that being the web, if it doesn't stay supported

Re: [dev] [surf] WebKit1 deprecated

2014-05-28 Thread YpN
Nick wrote: > If you read the patch you'll see it updates surf to use webkitgtk3. > Which I would guess uses Webkit 2. If that's the case it probably > makes sense to switch to it, if Webkit 1 is about to be deprecated. Yeah true, I guess I will need to "leave" GTK2 soon or late. > Hopefully

Re: [dev] [surf] WebKit1 deprecated

2014-05-28 Thread Andy Spencer
On 2014-05-28 20:29Z, Nick wrote: > If you read the patch you'll see it updates surf to use webkitgtk3. > Which I would guess uses Webkit 2. If that's the case it probably > makes sense to switch to it, if Webkit 1 is about to be deprecated. WebKit versions are weird, when you install webkit-gtk-2

Re: [dev] [surf] WebKit1 deprecated

2014-05-28 Thread Nick
Quoth YpN: > Markus Teich wrote: > > You can use http://surf.suckless.org/patches/smoothscrolling-via-GTK3 > > Excuse me, maybe I missed something, but could you tell me why you > posted that patch? I was mentioning the API itself, in my previous > email. If you read the patch you'll see it upda

Re: [dev] [surf] WebKit1 deprecated

2014-05-28 Thread YpN
Good evening Markus, Markus Teich wrote: > You can use http://surf.suckless.org/patches/smoothscrolling-via-GTK3 Excuse me, maybe I missed something, but could you tell me why you posted that patch? I was mentioning the API itself, in my previous email. Anyway, thank your for the patch, even if