On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 10:02:52PM +0200, Manolo Martínez wrote:
> On 05/01/14 at 12:25pm, Sam Dodrill wrote:
> > Have you looked into Zathura? http://pwmt.org/projects/zathura/
>
> That's the one I use. I should check mupdf again; I didn't like it the
> first time around.
I am using this one as
On 05/01/14 at 12:25pm, Sam Dodrill wrote:
> Have you looked into Zathura? http://pwmt.org/projects/zathura/
That's the one I use. I should check mupdf again; I didn't like it the
first time around.
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 12:33:36PM -0400, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Dimitris Papastamos:
> > After 332 commits and about 9 months of development, the first release
> > of ubase has been announced on http://suckless.org.
>
> Excellent, great work folks, and thanks to all involved.
>
> Is sbase 0.1 plan
(I could not resists...)
It misses a fullscreen, ... actually, it is pathced already.
This mupdf is likely an Android app.
CC build/debug/filt_dctd.o
fitz/filt_dctd.c:3:21: fatal error: jpeglib.h: No such file or directory
I think that a clone with a better Licencing would be nice somehow,
Have you looked into Zathura? http://pwmt.org/projects/zathura/
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:22:56PM +0200, patrick295767 patrick295767 wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> What about a lightweight pdf viewer for giving talks ?
>
> I am now modifying and recompiling xpdf. It is quite a light pdf viewer.
>
> Yo
It is actually probably less work than modding xpdf. mupdf is a nice idea.
I will check a bit the code. apt-get source mupdf,
and a man tells us:
I wonder if h,j,k,l could no be used to move to various page, and
actally we could use s,d,w,x for scrolling...
" L, R Rotate page left (clock
Quoth Andrew Gwozdziewycz:
> I'm not sure why a pdf reader would need the benefits of the AGPL,
> which to my knowledge, ensures that versions of the code that are
> accessible over a network count as being "distributed" and thus
> require the source code to be available. Seems like the GPL would b
Quoth patrick295767 patrick295767:
> Mupdf has a windows and src file.
It's also packaged for most distributions, but the build system is
reasonable if you want to use the source.
> Which key shortcut can you figure out, can you fly over your pdf
> document such as you may do with vim ... ?
Pre
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Anthony J. Bentley:
>> MuPDF is nice but has a disgusting license (AGPL).
>
> I second that, I like mupdf very much. I quite like the license,
> too, no doubt controversially.
I'm not sure why a pdf reader would need the benefits of the AGPL,
wh
On 01/05/14 11:36, Evan Gates wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay
> wrote:
> > I am not sure I understand why this would be wrong. Shouldn't calling ii
> > (via
> > ii or not) without arguments use the default values descibed in the man
> > page?
>
> My point is th
Mupdf has a windows and src file.
Which key shortcut can you figure out, can you fly over your pdf
document such as you may do with vim ... ?
http://www.mupdf.com/downloads/
Regards
2014-05-01 20:46 GMT+02:00 Nick :
> Quoth Anthony J. Bentley:
>> MuPDF is nice but has a disgusting license (AGPL
On Thu, 1 May 2014 11:47:26 -0700
Charlie Kester wrote:
> Now I need to get busy and scrub my scripts, getting rid of or rewriting
> anything that depends on GNUish cruft and other "improvements". (That's
> not a complaint about ubase or sbase, btw. I'm actually looking forward
> to this task.)
On Thu 01 May 2014 at 08:35:17 PDT Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
Greetings everyone.
After 332 commits and about 9 months of development, the first release
of ubase has been announced on http://suckless.org.
Very cool.
Now I need to get busy and scrub my scripts, getting rid of or rewriting
anyt
Quoth Anthony J. Bentley:
> MuPDF is nice but has a disgusting license (AGPL).
I second that, I like mupdf very much. I quite like the license,
too, no doubt controversially.
Hi Guys,
What about a lightweight pdf viewer for giving talks ?
I am now modifying and recompiling xpdf. It is quite a light pdf viewer.
You plug your Linux box, and give a great talk ;) !
Yours sincerely,
Pat
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay
wrote:
> I am not sure I understand why this would be wrong. Shouldn't calling ii (via
> ii or not) without arguments use the default values descibed in the man page?
My point is that argc will never be less than 1 (AFAIK). If you want
to u
patrick295767 patrick295767 writes:
> What about a lightweight pdf viewer for giving talks ?
>
> I am now modifying and recompiling xpdf. It is quite a light pdf viewer.
>
> You plug your Linux box, and give a great talk ;) !
MuPDF is nice but has a disgusting license (AGPL).
Quoth Dimitris Papastamos:
> After 332 commits and about 9 months of development, the first release
> of ubase has been announced on http://suckless.org.
Excellent, great work folks, and thanks to all involved.
Is sbase 0.1 planned to follow soon, then?
Morpheus looks interesting, I might try i
Greetings everyone.
After 332 commits and about 9 months of development, the first release
of ubase has been announced on http://suckless.org.
We are currently waiting for the distribution tarball to appear on
dl.suckless.org, but in the meantime you can grab the tarball from the tagged
release i
On 01/05/14 07:34, Evan Gates wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay
> wrote:
> > ii could be called without any argument, using the defaults described in the
> > manpage.
> >
> > - if (argc <= 1 || (argc == 2 && argv[1][0] == '-' && argv[1][1] ==
> > 'h')) usag
Hi Jean-Philippe,
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Jean-Philippe Gagné Guay
wrote:
> ii could be called without any argument, using the defaults described in the
> manpage.
>
> - if (argc <= 1 || (argc == 2 && argv[1][0] == '-' && argv[1][1] ==
> 'h')) usage();
> + if (argc < 1 || (
21 matches
Mail list logo