On 2014-01-22 14:10:21 +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> Copyright for new components can only take effect when those new
> components are written -- preemptively writing a copyright year for code
> that does not even exist yet simply does not make sense.
Ah, I missed that it previously said 2012, not 20
On 2014-01-21 23:12:08 +0100, Markus Teich wrote:
> I know it's a little bit late, but I just noticed this. It probably can be
> bumped to 2014 in the other repos as well.
Why?
Copyright for new components can only take effect when those new
components are written -- preemptively writing a copyri
Greetings.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:38:02 +0100 Markus Teich
wrote:
> ---
>
> Heyho,
>
> I know it's a little bit late, but I just noticed this. It probably can be
> bumped to 2014 in the other repos as well.
It’s been applied. Please don’t send tabbed patches to all authors, just
to dev@suckle
Any chance that this would get merged in (.gitignore notwithstanding)?
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:40:24PM +0100, q...@c9x.me wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:07:17AM -0600, Chris Down wrote:
>> > On 2013-12-01 18:19:22 -0500, Eyal Erez
Sorry to kill the mood here, but downloading the whole [0] (think of
Snowden: wget -r !!! !!1!) will let you search with the tools you are
used to and you can proceed with the data as you like.
For whatever reason your bandwidth is this damn luxury these days.
cheers!
mar77i
---
Heyho,
I know it's a little bit late, but I just noticed this. It probably can be
bumped to 2014 in the other repos as well.
--Markus
LICENSE | 2 +-
tabbed.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE
index add8a53..f5244dd 100644
--- a/LICEN
Greetings comrades.
Today tabbed 0.6[0] is released. What's new:
* Now there is Ctrl + t, which allows you to open the command string with the
entered string appended or you select a current tab in dmenu.
* Allow setting the colors on the commandline. This is useful for visualising
certain ta
> The patch mostly works for me, but it doesn't take into account the
> cwscale and chscale character scaling factors, and this leads to a
> glitchy moire-ish pattern in certain contexts (see attached
> bug-example-1.png and bug-example-2.png). I've adjusted the XCopyArea
> call (see attached patch
Alexander Huemer wrote:
> IMO it's not a good advice to let of all things google do that.
If you're just afraid of them profiling you, I can recommend startpage [0]. It
seems to avoid this, the servers are located in the netherlands, so I don't
think the US „law“ applies there. Still it delivers t
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:11:27 +0100
Alexander Huemer wrote:
>
> IMO it's not a good advice to let of all things google do that.
>
It is far from good solution, but often it is the only solution. Often
custom search engines written in Perl do horrible job of searching
through whole text. To su
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:58:41PM +0100, Paul Onyschuk wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:07:37 +0100
> Markus Wichmann wrote:
>
> >
> > Maybe it was. However, I found no such conversation in my personal
> > archive of this list (which goes back maybe a year or so), and the
> > official version of
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:05:51PM +, Nick wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:43:40PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Alexander Huemer dixit:
> > >After reading [1] I really wonder why MLs became so popular. I believe
> > >the problem of the usenet are the binary usegroups which became popu
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:43:40PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Alexander Huemer dixit:
> >After reading [1] I really wonder why MLs became so popular. I believe
> >the problem of the usenet are the binary usegroups which became popular
> >for warez and are now reduced to that in the view of t
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:45:36PM +, Nick wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:07:37PM +0100, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> > Also, maybe the majority here is unaware of what kind of a code base
> > Xlib is. I have seen OS kernels with less complexity.
>
> I haven't used either Xlib or XCB to any s
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:07:37 +0100
Markus Wichmann wrote:
>
> Maybe it was. However, I found no such conversation in my personal
> archive of this list (which goes back maybe a year or so), and the
> official version of the archive has no search function, nor has any
> attempt at sending Google
Alexander Huemer dixit:
>> What client do you use for newsgroups?
[…]
>I totally agree. Most Client applications for NNTP suck. Somebody^{(tm)}
>should write a better alternative.
pine rocks, IMHO. My problem is rather that I’ve got no access² to a
working “regular” usenet server any more, only
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:03:19PM +, Nick wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:52:11PM +0100, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Martti Kühne wrote:
> > > There's [0] and [1]. [0] offers alternative protocol access (nntp).
> >
> > Yes, GMANE was created exact
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Martti Kühne wrote:
> There's [0] and [1]. [0] offers alternative protocol access (nntp).
>
> cheers!
> mar77i
>
> [0] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.suckless
> [1] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/index.html
>
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 03:18:31PM +0200,
> [1] is just the web frontend to the email archive. I don't see a way to
> search there, nor to download the raw messages. Did you maybe paste the
> wrong link?
Wait what isin't search box in a middle of the page? An on results page there
are more fields for more precise search!
http://dir.gman
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Nick wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:07:37PM +0100, Markus Wichmann wrote:
>> Also, maybe the majority here is unaware of what kind of a code base
>> Xlib is. I have seen OS kernels with less complexity.
>
> I haven't used either Xlib or XCB to any significant
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:52:11PM +0100, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Martti Kühne wrote:
> > There's [0] and [1]. [0] offers alternative protocol access (nntp).
>
> Yes, GMANE was created exactly for the reason I mentioned. But the whole
> thing should be
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:31:40PM +0100, Martti Kühne wrote:
> There's [0] and [1]. [0] offers alternative protocol access (nntp).
Yes, GMANE was created exactly for the reason I mentioned. But the whole
thing should be the other way around. A NNTP newsgroup that _maybe_ has
an additional email
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:07:37PM +0100, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> Also, maybe the majority here is unaware of what kind of a code base
> Xlib is. I have seen OS kernels with less complexity.
I haven't used either Xlib or XCB to any significant degree, but
isn't the XCB code generated from an XML
There's [0] and [1]. [0] offers alternative protocol access (nntp).
cheers!
mar77i
[0] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.misc.suckless
[1] http://lists.suckless.org/dev/index.html
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:07:37PM +0100, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> archive of this list (which goes back maybe a year or so), and the
> official version of the archive has no search function, nor has any
> attempt at sending Google on that archive been successful. And since the
> archive only has i
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:59:48AM +0100, Alexander Huemer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:41:54AM +0100, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> > I got bored over the weekend and decided to start porting dwm to XCB.
> > The reason being that XCB rules and Xlib drools. I'm almost done with
> > dwm.c, but I h
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:41:54AM +0100, Markus Wichmann wrote:
> I got bored over the weekend and decided to start porting dwm to XCB.
> The reason being that XCB rules and Xlib drools. I'm almost done with
> dwm.c, but I have come across a few problems I'd like to discuss here.
I think it would
Hi all,
I got bored over the weekend and decided to start porting dwm to XCB.
The reason being that XCB rules and Xlib drools. I'm almost done with
dwm.c, but I have come across a few problems I'd like to discuss here.
First of all, how do we do error handling? Xlib has those error handler
functi
28 matches
Mail list logo
