Re: [dev] [sbase] [patch] Add ARGNUM and ARGNUMF(base)

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 10:15:57PM +0200, sin wrote: > Hi, > > Support obsolete syntax -NUM for head, tail and fold. There is a bug that I need to fix (we do multiple passes through the argument at the moment). Will re-send. bye, sin

[dev] [sbase] [patch] Add ARGNUM and ARGNUMF(base)

Hi, Support obsolete syntax -NUM for head, tail and fold. Thanks, sin >From 5dbf3287ac318d428fa2bee6323f5f5b209e959a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: dsp Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:53:01 + Subject: [PATCH] Add ARGNUM and ARGNUMF(base) This is useful to support the obsolete syntax -NUM for tool

Mailing list behaviour - was: [dev] [dmenu] [dwm] [patch] open in new terminal window

Please don't reply to a random message in order to start a new thread! I see people do this from time to time on most of the lists I subscribe to. Almost never do anybody complain about it, but to me it seems just as bad as top posting. There is absolutely no reason to do this. And the irony of t