* Alexander S. [2013-11-08 08:22:37 +0400]:
> There seems to be some misunderstanding about what is type-safety and
> when checks are made.
as i said this static type-checking fantasy does not work without
runtime type information, not because you need any further checks
at runtime, but because e
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:42:27AM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> Why do I top post? yes i am lazy! After being with gmail since it was
> in beta, I still don't have an option to god damned bottom-post by
> default!!
FFS, wth? If you do something try to do it well. How much trouble is it to edit