---
Heyho,
i updated my patch to add -r flag to ls as suggested by Alex S.
--Markus
ls.1 | 3 +++
ls.c | 12
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ls.1 b/ls.1
index 00ae32b..f10c929 100644
--- a/ls.1
+++ b/ls.1
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ lists directories themsel
On 05/10/2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>Yes, sorry, I missed that it bound to IPv4 alone by default. Should
>>work now. Thanks.
>
> Nope – maybe it’s firewalled (looks like pf block drop)?
>
> tg@blau:~ $ nc -v6 starchlinux.org 80
> nc: connect to starchlinux.org port 80 (tcp) failed: Operation ti
Strake dixit:
>> “HTTP/1.1 200 Schön”?!
>
>What, is this improper usage?
No, just funny.
>Yes, sorry, I missed that it bound to IPv4 alone by default. Should
>work now. Thanks.
Nope – maybe it’s firewalled (looks like pf block drop)?
tg@blau:~ $ nc -v6 starchlinux.org 80
nc: connect to starchl
On 05/10/2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Strake dixit:
>
>>http://starchlinux.org/
>
> “HTTP/1.1 200 Schön”?!
What, is this improper usage?
> One rather important thing: starchlinux.org has got an RR
> but the httpd does not listen on IP, only on Legacy IP. Please
> fix that, because otherwi
Strake dixit:
>http://starchlinux.org/
“HTTP/1.1 200 Schön”?!
One rather important thing: starchlinux.org has got an RR
but the httpd does not listen on IP, only on Legacy IP. Please
fix that, because otherwise, a good part of the ’net can’t ac‐
cess your site.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[ Natur
2013/10/5 Rob :
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:45:56PM +0400, Alexander S. wrote:
>> 2013/10/4 Raphaël Proust :
>> If we want to retain this patch, I'd suggest reversing array after
>> sorting, not multiplying by `sortorder' in comparison functions. This
>> avoids code duplication.
>
> I disagree - r
Rob wrote:
> I disagree - rather than adding a sort call and changing the program's
> runtime complexity, can't we just reduce the amount of lines _and_
> duplication like this:
>
> @@ -89,9 +93,9 @@ entcmp(const void *va, const void *vb)
> const Entry *a = va, *b = vb;
>
> - if(tfl
Oops, I realized after a pull that I tried to break style (by
declaring a local not at the top of a function). I've corrected that
and also rebased these three on the current head.
-Mark
0001-Simplify-Mod1-logic-in-kpress-eliminating-locals-and.patch
Description: Binary data
0003-New-ttys
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:45:56PM +0400, Alexander S. wrote:
> 2013/10/4 Raphaël Proust :
> If we want to retain this patch, I'd suggest reversing array after
> sorting, not multiplying by `sortorder' in comparison functions. This
> avoids code duplication.
I disagree - rather than adding a sort
OK, I've split this change into three patches. The cumulative affect
of these is:
kpress() is now much more straightforward and has no memcpy() calls.
selnotify() now supports MODE_ECHO. I couldn't remove the cast there however.
A new ttysend() function replaces all ttywrite();techo() sequences.
10 matches
Mail list logo
