On 24/05/2013, Random832 wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 07:13 PM, Strake wrote:
>>> And you spend a day on wikipedia or tvtropes and you've got two hundred
>>> HTML viewers open?
>> Yes.
>
> I meant as opposed to the usual dozen.
>> The viewer sends a "go" message back to the fetcher, which kills the
>> o
On 05/24/2013 07:13 PM, Strake wrote:
And you spend a day on wikipedia or tvtropes and you've got two hundred
HTML viewers open?
Yes.
I meant as opposed to the usual dozen.
The viewer sends a "go" message back to the fetcher, which kills the
old viewer and loads the new one, and can keep a UR
On 24/05/2013, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013, at 16:02, Strake wrote:
>> Yes. A web browser ought to have a component to fetch documents and
>> start the appropriate viewer, as in mailcap. The whole monolithic web
>> browser model is flawed.
>
> And you spend a day on wikiped
On Fri, May 24, 2013, at 16:02, Strake wrote:
> Yes. A web browser ought to have a component to fetch documents and
> start the appropriate viewer, as in mailcap. The whole monolithic web
> browser model is flawed.
And you spend a day on wikipedia or tvtropes and you've got two hundred
HTML viewer
On 24/05/2013, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> There is mime, which can be combined with mailcap in a useful way.
Yes. A web browser ought to have a component to fetch documents and
start the appropriate viewer, as in mailcap. The whole monolithic web
browser model is flawed.
Hi,
You can also use keysym instead of the name. On AZERTY, when you press &,
it shows:
state 0x10, keycode 10 (keysym 0x26, ampersand),
Personnally, I use 0x26 and not XK_ampersand
--
H.Mo.
As example, on azerty, 12345 is replaced by &é"'(.
Associated keycodes are :
XK_ampersand,XK_eacute,XK_quotedbl,XK_apostrophe,XK_parenleft
Such things can be found via xev, as it has benn already said.
--
,--.
: /` ) Xavier Cartron
| `-'http://yeuxdelibad.net
\_
signature.asc
Descr
> Use the keys array. If you don't know the name of the keys use xev.
xev is the tool what I was looking for. Thanks.
Regards,
Szymon
On 24.05.13 at 06:55pm, Szymon Olewniczak wrote:
I assign this keys to point to dwm tags.
Use the keys array. If you don't know the name of the keys use xev.
--
CXblut
cxb...@gmail.com
#blut on irc.freenode.net
@cxblut twitter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 25 May 2013 00:55, Szymon Olewniczak wrote:
> today I decided to switch from i3 to dwm. Nearly
> everything works perfectly instead of tags. I using dvorak programmer
> keyboard and instad
> of 123456789 on the top row of keyboard I have: &[{}(=*)+] . Now how can
> I assign this keys to point
Hi,
today I decided to switch from i3 to dwm. Nearly
everything works perfectly instead of tags. I using dvorak programmer keyboard
and instad
of 123456789 on the top row of keyboard I have: &[{}(=*)+] . Now how can
I assign this keys to point to dwm tags.
Regards,
Szymon
On May 24, 2013 4:11 PM, "Christian Neukirchen"
wrote:
> > Types can't be declared properly in Gopher.
>
> Types can't be declared properly in Unix.
There is mime, which can be combined with mailcap in a useful way.
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Greetings.
On Fri, 24 May 2013 17:44:50 +0200 Nick wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:04:16AM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> > Sanitized HTTP could do. 9p and gopher could do as well.
>
> No, gopher sucks a lot. Seriously. Look at how its menu / index
> system works. It's interesting historic
Greetings.
On Fri, 24 May 2013 17:47:18 +0200 Prakhar Goel wrote:
> Anybody take a look at the /browser idea?
>
> Site:http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/10/get-browser-exe/
As mentioned in the thread before, long ago there was this idea to
transmit safe tcl as MIME attachments and make e‐mail r
Nick dixit:
>and hackable base. It's certainly in the interests of many
>unpleasant organisations to force people to 'consume web content' in
>the way proposed, such that it can't readily be scraped or changed,
I think that thing is called “Television”. Not really sure,
considering I stopped deal
On 05/24/2013 02:35 PM, Strake wrote:
It has saner syntax, too.
In special, fewer quotation marks :)
On 24/05/2013, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 02:11 PM, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
>> Types can't be declared properly in Unix.
> In Unix, filetype are defined on a per file basis.
Yes — file type, not data type.
> Delimeters in IPC text streams are defined using $IFS.
> Rc is hailed
On 05/24/2013 02:11 PM, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
Types can't be declared properly in Unix.
In Unix, filetype are defined on a per file basis. Delimeters in IPC
text streams are defined using $IFS. Rc is hailed exclusively because it
makes less use if $IFS. Well, that and the Plan 9 label.
Bjartur Thorlacius writes:
> On 05/24/13 12:02, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
>>
>> That said, I never actually tried to make any serious use of gopher
>> (not to mention content creation), so I may be misunderstanding
>> it. But even if there is no protocol better then HTTP, it doesn't
>> necessarily
On 05/24/13 12:02, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
That said, I never actually tried to make any serious use of gopher
(not to mention content creation), so I may be misunderstanding it.
But even if there is no protocol better then HTTP, it doesn't
necessarily mean that HTTP is OK.
Types can't be d
On May 24, 2013 2:36 PM, "Nick" wrote:
> It's the web designers who are primarily responsible
> for ruining things. And those who pay them.
I sincerely believe that any technology lying between non-technical
consumers and goods/services providers is deemed to get abused all the
possi
On 24/05/2013, Nick wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:02:42PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> Yes. Some site map or apache index style thing that was wholely
> standard and couldn't be "styled" would be very useful.
Over 9p, this would be the directory structure, so it would come for free.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:02:42PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> Well, I meant the networking part of gopher, not its menu system.
Oh good, OK, yes I was refering to its menu system. I don't know
anything about how it does networking.
> BTW it would be nice to have some syntax-free menu system
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> But even if there is no protocol better then HTTP, it doesn't necessarily
> mean that HTTP
> is OK.
The best possible solution to a particular problem should be OK for
the purpose of solving the problem.
IMHO, the thing is that multiple
On May 24, 2013 11:44 AM, "Nick" wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:04:16AM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> > Sanitized HTTP could do. 9p and gopher could do as well.
>
> No, gopher sucks a lot. Seriously. Look at how its menu / index
> system works. It's interesting historically, and there ar
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:46:58PM +0200, Fernando C.V. wrote:
> But then it would also compromise the openness and "hackability" of the web.
> I like that I can easily inject my own javascript or css on any
> website to make it do what I want, remove whatever advertising or any
> sections I don't
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Prakhar Goel wrote:
> Anybody take a look at the /browser idea?
>
> Site:http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/10/get-browser-exe/
>
> -- PG.
>
> More like GET /browser.js...
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Prakhar Goel wrote:
> Anybody take a look at the /browser idea?
>
> Site:http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/10/get-browser-exe/
That looks interesting.
But then it would also compromise the openness and "hackability" of the web.
I like that I can easily inject my own j
On May 24, 2013 11:58 AM, "Prakhar Goel" wrote:
>
> Anybody take a look at the /browser idea?
>
> Site:http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/10/get-browser-exe/
To me it sounds like "let's make the web so unusable that people will have
to abandon it".
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Anybody take a look at the /browser idea?
Site:http://blog.ezyang.com/2012/10/get-browser-exe/
-- PG.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 08:04:16AM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> Sanitized HTTP could do. 9p and gopher could do as well.
No, gopher sucks a lot. Seriously. Look at how its menu / index
system works. It's interesting historically, and there are a few
interesting gopher sites out there, but if w
Sam Watkins dixit:
>Would you rather everyone is exchanging binary word documents
>over sun-rpc, or something like that?
How about plaintext over ssh, possibly with rsync-over-ssh?
That’s Unix.
(IMAPS and SMTP also work…)
bye,
//mirabilos
--
> Hi, does anyone sell openbsd stickers by themselv
32 matches
Mail list logo
