On Tue, May 14, 2013, at 8:50, Martti Kühne wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:44 PM, wrote:
> > On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 23:20, Sam Watkins wrote:
> >> HTTP PUT with ranges would be useful, could mount filesystems over HTTP.
> >
> > There's no standard HTTP directory listing.
>
> How is lack of
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > XML is for the file listing. :-)
> > https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/krkl
>
> That link is a crime against humanity and progress. It???s like giving
> bibles to children.
No, the style is not as good.
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
umount -f /mnt/sshfs
His highness, preach us about the goodness and wisdom of FTP instead,
the protocol where the server waits for the client to open a reverse
session...
Usually, free time doesn't permit a self-coded solution, here I sit
using ssh and sshfs for virtually everything.
cheers!
mar77i
Greetings.
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:31:26 +0200 Kai Hendry wrote:
> On 13 May 2013 23:11, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > how can you chadbands use a file transfer protocol without XML?!
>
> XML is for the file listing. :-) https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/krkl
That link is a crime
On 13 May 2013 23:11, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> how can you chadbands use a file transfer protocol without XML?!
XML is for the file listing. :-) https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/krkl
On 14 May 2013 17:12, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:12:18 +0200 Martti Kühne wrote:
>> How is lack of a standard a problem in that concern? The topic was
>> about uploads, and even my cfw cgi server [0] supports uploads and you
>> could just go and implement a s
Greetings.
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:12:18 +0200 Martti Kühne wrote:
> How is lack of a standard a problem in that concern? The topic was
> about uploads, and even my cfw cgi server [0] supports uploads and you
> could just go and implement a sufficiently featured directory listing
> that fits your
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:44 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 23:20, Sam Watkins wrote:
>> HTTP PUT with ranges would be useful, could mount filesystems over HTTP.
>
> There's no standard HTTP directory listing.
>
How is lack of a standard a problem in that concern? The topic was
about upl
On Mon, May 13, 2013, at 23:20, Sam Watkins wrote:
> HTTP PUT with ranges would be useful, could mount filesystems over HTTP.
There's no standard HTTP directory listing.
10 matches
Mail list logo