Re: [dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread Joerg Jung
Am 19.04.2013 um 21:11 schrieb Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:11:22 +0200 "Anthony J. Bentley" > wrote: >> That's because the st makefiles use $(shell ...) which is a GNUism. > > I’ve applied your patch. Thanks. Good. Would you mind rolling a new release, so that

Re: [dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread Gregor Best
Ahoy, On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:07:57PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > [...] > Doesn’t your patch imply that > [...] > on OpenBSD is flawed and should be fixed? > [...] Nope, that works. It's a GNUism-issue. > I won’t apply such a fix to st, that’s a problem pkg‐config has to > solve.

Re: [dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Christoph Lohmann writes: > Greetings. > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:11:22 +0200 "Anthony J. Bentley" w > rote: > > That's because the st makefiles use $(shell ...) which is a GNUism. > > I’ve applied your patch. Thanks. > > Shouldn’t using GNUisms then provide a meaningful error when they app

Re: [dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:11:22 +0200 "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote: > That's because the st makefiles use $(shell ...) which is a GNUism. I’ve applied your patch. Thanks. Shouldn’t using GNUisms then provide a meaningful error when they appear on BSD make? Maybe some message like »That

Re: [dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread Christoph Lohmann
Greetings. On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 21:07:57 +0200 Gregor Best wrote: > I'm on OpenBSD -current at the moment and the latest git HEAD of st compiles > with the following patch: > > diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk > index 88355c7..f1a24d7 100644 > --- a/config.mk > +++ b/con

Re: [dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Gregor Best writes: > I'm on OpenBSD -current at the moment and the latest git HEAD of st compiles > with the following patch: > > diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk > index 88355c7..f1a24d7 100644 > --- a/config.mk > +++ b/config.mk > @@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ LDFLAGS += -g

Re: [dev] [dmenu] What is the status of the project?

2013-04-19 Thread Fernando C.V.
A feature that would be a nice improvement would be to extend the behaviour of the -f flag to not only grab the keyboard but also draw the window already and start adding entries to the menu as they are received from stdin. That way, we bring dmenu to the user at the instand t=0, even while a extr

Re: [dev] Windows binaries

2013-04-19 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Noah Birnel wrote: > Static linking needs mingw and I haven't done it. Considering you need X > for the 3 progs mentioned above, I've seen no point in carrying them > around to windows boxes without Cygwin. I don't remember which project had at one point an incom

Re: [dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread David Lind
Verified, this works! Thanks. /David On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Gregor Best wrote: I'm on OpenBSD -current at the moment and the latest git HEAD of st compiles with the following patch: diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk index 88355c7..f1a24d7 100644 --- a/config.mk

Re: [dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread Gregor Best
I'm on OpenBSD -current at the moment and the latest git HEAD of st compiles with the following patch: diff --git a/config.mk b/config.mk index 88355c7..f1a24d7 100644 --- a/config.mk +++ b/config.mk @@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ LDFLAGS += -g ${LIBS} # compile

[dev] ST 0.4 and OpenBSD 5.2

2013-04-19 Thread David Lind
Hi, I am trying to compile ST 0.4 on a OpenBSD 5.2 system, however, these errors appears: In file included from /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xlib.h:47, from st.c:23: /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xfuncproto.h:135:24: warning: ISO C does not permit named variadic macros In file included f