On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 06:34:00AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:34:00 +0100 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:53:47PM -0500, Strake wrote:
> > > On 23/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> initscripts are
Greetings.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:34:00 +0100 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:53:47PM -0500, Strake wrote:
> > On 23/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> initscripts are weak.
> > >
> > > what do you need them to do? what does weak really mean here?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 03:53:47PM -0500, Strake wrote:
> On 23/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> initscripts are weak.
> >
> > what do you need them to do? what does weak really mean here?
>
> Sorry, my comment was indeed vague.
>
> I meant the Arch initscripts, tho this may well be t
On 25/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So then weak is rather sufficient. Sorry, it sounded like this up
> there was your wishlist.
It was.
> Now it got to be a good example of what I really don't need in my init
> scripts :)
Glad to help.
---
When trying to Tab-complete on strings with length >= BUFSIZ, dmenu incorrectly
handles copying and then calls strlen() on non-null-terminated buffer.
On my system, this led to freeze rather that just crash, which is much worse
due to dmenu grabbing keyboard.
This patch fixes that behaviour wit
So then weak is rather sufficient. Sorry, it sounded like this up
there was your wishlist. Now it got to be a good example of what I
really don't need in my init scripts :)
On 3/25/13, Strake wrote:
> On 25/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's all fixable without creating huge system
On 25/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's all fixable without creating huge systems or frameworks.
I agree. I never said that I want a huge system or framework.
> I think you're just confused from what ubuntu made you think is useful.
I think you're just confused about whether you'r
That's all fixable without creating huge systems or frameworks. I
think you're just confused from what ubuntu made you think is useful.
I have no need for any of this shit to be done automagically.
On 3/25/13, Strake wrote:
> On 23/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> initscripts are weak
On 23/03/2013, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> initscripts are weak.
>
> what do you need them to do? what does weak really mean here?
Sorry, my comment was indeed vague.
I meant the Arch initscripts, tho this may well be true of many:
* won't automatically re-start service that dies; network
