Hey Christoph,
The pictures I took are after I used tmux to split the terminal up into 4
parts, if you wish to recreate the scenario.
Thanks for mentioning the issue with wide characters as well, I may try and
submit a patch for it.
Thank you,
Lee
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Christoph Loh
On 8 January 2013 23:28, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Ivan Kanakarakis [2013-01-08 14:52]:
>> On 8 January 2013 14:02, Nico Golde wrote:
>> > * Anselm R Garbe [2013-01-08 12:50]:
>> >> On 8 January 2013 03:05, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
>> >> > I've been tweaking ii's code lately, mainly cleaning
Hi,
* Ivan Kanakarakis [2013-01-08 14:52]:
> On 8 January 2013 14:02, Nico Golde wrote:
> > * Anselm R Garbe [2013-01-08 12:50]:
> >> On 8 January 2013 03:05, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> >> > I've been tweaking ii's code lately, mainly cleaning it up
> >> > and fixing a couple of things I noticed
I don't think it's bloat so much. It's all about switch two buffers.
Look at this example: http://wiki.osdev.org/Double_Buffering#Example_in_C
I'm a bit rusty about C coding and Xlib but if nobody implements it I'll
try to play around a bit by myself.
2013/1/8 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>
Greetings.
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:29:25 +0100 Lee Fallat wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Here's another bug to report for latest st in git (last night's st). Some
> box characters appear blurred and a little messed up. In rxvt this behavior
> does not happen. I have included example screenshots.
>
>
Greetings.
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:16:17 +0100 clamiax wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started to use Xinerama at office. Just want to inform you, if you
> already don't know it, that Xinerama (panoramix) and the DBE extension are
> mutually excluded[0]. Thus, for those who use xinerama, st is unusable.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:55 AM, clamiax wrote:
> That's mine: http://sprunge.us/bEeM
>
> Not sure what to compare, though. For what is worth there's nothing about
> dbe in both.
Under Extensions you'll notice that mine mentions DOUBLE-BUFFER, where
yours does not. I don't see anything on my sys
That's mine: http://sprunge.us/bEeM
Not sure what to compare, though. For what is worth there's nothing about
dbe in both.
2013/1/8 Carlos Torres
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Carlos Torres
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, clamiax wrote:
> >> DbeExtensionInit() just returns
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Carlos Torres wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, clamiax wrote:
>> DbeExtensionInit() just returns when Xinerama is enabled. I told my
>> xorg.conf to load dbe but while trying to run st, XdbeQueryExtension()
>> returns false.
>>
>> What's the story?
>
> ri
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, clamiax wrote:
> DbeExtensionInit() just returns when Xinerama is enabled. I told my
> xorg.conf to load dbe but while trying to run st, XdbeQueryExtension()
> returns false.
>
> What's the story?
right, i forgot to check whether i have dbe loaded and enabled. :p
DbeExtensionInit() just returns when Xinerama is enabled. I told my
xorg.conf to load dbe but while trying to run st, XdbeQueryExtension()
returns false.
What's the story?
2013/1/8 Carlos Torres
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:02 AM, clamiax wrote:
> > Does your st is built after 2012-07-28?
> >
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:02 AM, clamiax wrote:
> Does your st is built after 2012-07-28?
>
That seems quite a ways back, i'm on 73879c1... and was able to compile and run.
I believe thats tip...
--Carlos
Does your st is built after 2012-07-28?
2013/1/8 Carlos Torres
> > Thus, for those who use xinerama, st is unusable.
>
> i run Xinerama (through Nvidia) and st just fine. maybe i don't have
> double buffer.
>
>
> Thus, for those who use xinerama, st is unusable.
i run Xinerama (through Nvidia) and st just fine. maybe i don't have
double buffer.
Hi,
I started to use Xinerama at office. Just want to inform you, if you
already don't know it, that Xinerama (panoramix) and the DBE extension are
mutually excluded[0]. Thus, for those who use xinerama, st is unusable.
[0] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/dbe/dbe.c#n1433
Regards,
hey arg, nion,
On 8 January 2013 14:02, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Anselm R Garbe [2013-01-08 12:50]:
>> On 8 January 2013 03:05, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
>> > I've been tweaking ii's code lately, mainly cleaning it up
>> > and fixing a couple of things I noticed, but ended up
>> > rewriting it
Thanks for the good suggestions - I'll have a pop at the daemon and
see how it goes.
Cheers,
Rob
Hi,
* Anselm R Garbe [2013-01-08 12:50]:
> On 8 January 2013 03:05, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> > I've been tweaking ii's code lately, mainly cleaning it up
> > and fixing a couple of things I noticed, but ended up
> > rewriting it from scratch.
> > Thus resulted iim[0] (name given by ^7heo on irc
On 8 January 2013 03:05, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> hello all,
>
> I've been tweaking ii's code lately, mainly cleaning it up
> and fixing a couple of things I noticed, but ended up
> rewriting it from scratch.
> Thus resulted iim[0] (name given by ^7heo on irc - thanks)
Why not contributing to th
Thanks for trying it out and reporting.
I also changed the hardcoded socket type.
Should be good now.
On 8 January 2013 05:45, Ryan Mullen wrote:
> Cool, thanks.
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
>> I've been tweaking ii's code lately, mainly cleaning it up
>> and fix
20 matches
Mail list logo
