[dev][surf] pango v2.32

2012-11-30 Thread Hannes Blut
I did a system upgrade (I use Arch) today and also fetched surf from git. During make following error appeared: //make surf build options: CFLAGS = -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Os -I. -I/usr/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk

Re: [dev] Git? Bitch Please

2012-11-30 Thread uki
2012/11/30 Al Gest : > My biggest problem with fossil and why I wouldn't call it suckless is > "there's an embedded webserver with bugtracker and todo management." as > pancake highlighted. > > It doesn't really follow the UNIX philosophy of "do one thing, and do it > well". and since git is quite

Re: [dev] Git? Bitch Please

2012-11-30 Thread Al Gest
My biggest problem with fossil and why I wouldn't call it suckless is "there's an embedded webserver with bugtracker and todo management." as pancake highlighted. It doesn't really follow the UNIX philosophy of "do one thing, and do it well". On 30 November 2012 12:39, Stanislav Paskalev wrote:

Re: [dev] Git? Bitch Please

2012-11-30 Thread Stanislav Paskalev
Sqlite is proven, both as a code base, and as scale. (Especially for tiny amounts of data such as source code. See netbsd's fossil repository for large amounts) Stripped and upx'd, a fossil binary is under 500k. I haven't tried to link it statically though. Both are from the same author and the mai

Re: [dev] Git? Bitch Please

2012-11-30 Thread Brandon Invergo
> but yeah, a part from that fossil is nice, but there's little userbase and > i doubt there are transition tools to convert a repo from/to fossil. git > is much more widespread. http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/help/import

Re: [dev] Git? Bitch Please

2012-11-30 Thread pancake
the reason why fossil is not suckless is: - database is sqlite (i doubt it can scale as much as git) - there's an embedded webserver with bugtracker and todo management. but yeah, a part from that fossil is nice, but there's little userbase and i doubt there are transition tools to convert a r

[dev] Git? Bitch Please

2012-11-30 Thread sramov
$ pkg_info -L fossil Information for inst:fossil-1.24v0 Files: /usr/local/bin/fossil $ ldd `which fossil` /usr/local/bin/fossil: StartEnd Type Open Ref GrpRef Name 1a507ab0 1a507afea000 exe

Re: [dev] Migration to git

2012-11-30 Thread Barbu Paul - Gheorghe
On 11/30/2012 01:57 AM, uki wrote: you can still use mercurial, with it's hg-git extension, I sometimes had small problems with it on huge repositories at work, never had any problem with open source projects (maybe it's the size or less of 'do whatever' attitude) Yeah, I'm not much of a hg use