On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> Anyone has done the wget/curl scripts together to handle referer, cook‐
> ies and whatever else is needed to fool websites, so it could be used in
> surf?
>
> Such a script would be useful for other not‐surf‐related down
Dear God, amen
On Nov 16, 2012 4:38 PM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings comrades.
>
> If you are using surf, be noticed that you should change your useragent
> value in your config.h. The default is now changed to something that
> will work with the mediocre technolo
Greetings comrades.
If you are using surf, be noticed that you should change your useragent
value in your config.h. The default is now changed to something that
will work with the mediocre technology at Google, which needs correct
useragent strings to work with their bloated javascript cra
it should be enough to always send the site's base url as referrer.
Greetings.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:50:02 +0100 Hiltjo Posthuma
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Nick wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> >
> >> For privacy reasons it's probably best to only pass the referrer
> >> if the target download uri is f
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Nick wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
>> For privacy reasons it's probably best to only pass the referrer
>> if the target download uri is from the same site.
>
> Not sure about this. We happily pass the referrer around ev
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Some sites check the HTTP referrer
Ah, good point, I'd forgotten about that. Such sites seem to be
reasonably rare, but worth supporting.
> For privacy reasons it's probably best to only pass the referrer
> if the target download
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Nick wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:29:25PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> On my TODO list for surf is to get the downloading right
>
> What are your plans for this? There's a patch on the wiki using
> webkit's built-in download support, but it was decided
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:29:25PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> On my TODO list for surf is to get the downloading right
What are your plans for this? There's a patch on the wiki using
webkit's built-in download support, but it was decided that wget
actually tended to work fine. Are there any
Greetings comrades,
surf now has a nice surf‐open.sh script in its tip, which will add some
more convenience for daily usage of surf as a replacement for other
browsers. With the toggle patches to disable scripting and other re‐
source‐hungry crap noone really needs but marketing peop
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:13:56AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Who will send the patch to replace Webkit with something sane?
>
> Sincerely,
> Christoph Lohmann
Well there is no sane thing for web, and I think trying to make one would drive
the creator insane. I think the closest thing to s
Greetings.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:33:32 +0100 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> This patch clean a bit the definition of Home key.
Applied. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
This patch clean a bit the definition of Home key.
>From 9eb08122011a9f2c19a5ba74208d73b6a1bde0f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:11:25 +0100
Subject: Add application cursor sequences for Home
The commit 'Fixing some key issues with mc' fix t
Greetings.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:13:56 +0100 sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> * Nick [2012-11-15 15:47]:
> > Insert mode? Since when did surf become modal? Why is this needed
> > (except for people who like to pretend they're using vim)?
>
> I agree, insert mode is quite special and maybe is wor
14 matches
Mail list logo
