What was wrong with -f commandline switch from the xft branch? Half
the point is to avoid having to compile a unique binary per font. But
whatever
2012/9/19 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> Greetings.
>
> Attached is a port of the xft branch to the current tip of st. It will
> activate xft
Hi,
I wonder if it's possible to get something like xterm's
eightBitInput=true in st. I would like to use the alt key for some vim
mappings. I'm not at all savvy on terminal stuff so any hint about how
to hack the code to get this working would be very much appreciated.
Best regards
--
Carlos
On 19/09/2012, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> Maybe a good solution could be
> integrate tmux inside of st (for example if STTMUX is defined, run tmux in
> starup).
Yeah! Oh, we could have a variable for everything that one could wish
to start in st: STTMUX, STGNUSCREEN, STAALIBKDE...
or w
Greetings.
Attached is a port of the xft branch to the current tip of st. It will
activate xft support and more fonts than just corefonts. I really tried
to find corefonts that would look good and represent nearly all unicode
characters – it's impossible.
Please report back if it works. I will th
Well... I was asking about comments and suggestion of the patches. I am not
the person who can accept or deny new suggestion, but I am going to give my
personal opinion.
> Would you also port st to wayland?
I think in case of being possible, st is very far to do this, because it has
a lot of thin
Just use 9term.
Quoth Peter Hartman:
> 2012/9/19 pancake :
> > How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer?
>
> We don't want scrollback buffers.
Some of us do.
2012/9/19 pancake :
> How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer?
We don't want scrollback buffers.
--
sic dicit magister P
Université du Québec à Montréal / Loyola University Chicago
http://individual.utoronto.ca/peterjh
gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F5
computas are not art.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Because of this I have a request. Please vote for your most favourite
> suckless cloud implementation. Both are attached.
cl has fewer lines of code, and a shorter name, so it sucks less. I
don't really care if they perfo
How many patches are left to get scrollback buffer?
On Sep 19, 2012, at 20:42, "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions.
>
> Best regards.
> <0001-Clear-X-window-in-tsetreset.patch>
> <0002-Remove-unused-parameters-in
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions.
>
> Best regards.
Would you also port st to wayland?
cheers!
mar77i
Hi,
A new serie of patches for st. Please send comments or suggestions.
Best regards.
>From 703b3cfc0cdb4998abca6815dd32699705a9f912 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:42:48 +0200
Subject: Clear X window in tsetreset()
tsetreset() is c
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 04:43:17PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Paul Weber
> wrote:
> > Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote:
> >>
> >> CGD runs as a FastCGI wrapper (to be used with nginx or similar web
> >> server) or as a standalone HTTP server, handing over all
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> * Stephen Paul Weber [2012-09-19 17:00]:
>
>>> Still, forking is never the bottleneck
>>
>>
>> Never? Isn't forking-as-bottleneck most of the reason alternatives to CGI
>> exist?
>
>
> One of the bottlenecks of CGI is that the popular "
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Peter Hartman
wrote:
>> I'd like to know is this kind of jokes is considered funny here.
>
> Which kind of joke?
>
Those metajokes are indeed funny. I'm still not sure if he was
relating to OP or just to himself.
> I'd like to know is this kind of jokes is considered funny here.
Which kind of joke?
--
sic dicit magister P
Université du Québec à Montréal / Loyola University Chicago
http://individual.utoronto.ca/peterjh
gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F59B)
gpg --keyserve
2012/9/19 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> Greetings.
>
> Suckless can't stand behind the developments of the sucking world.
> Because of this I have a request. Please vote for your most favourite
> suckless cloud implementation. Both are attached.
>
> The winner will be shown in art galleries
Greetings.
Suckless can't stand behind the developments of the sucking world.
Because of this I have a request. Please vote for your most favourite
suckless cloud implementation. Both are attached.
The winner will be shown in art galleries all over Europe.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
#!/bin/s
* Stephen Paul Weber [2012-09-19 17:00]:
Still, forking is never the bottleneck
Never? Isn't forking-as-bottleneck most of the reason alternatives to
CGI exist?
One of the bottlenecks of CGI is that the popular "web scripting" languages
(i.e. PHP, Perl, Python, Ruby) make it horribly inef
On 9/19/12, Stephen Paul Weber wrote:
>>Still, forking is never the bottleneck
>
> Never? Isn't forking-as-bottleneck most of the reason alternatives to CGI
> exist?
The bottleneck is more likely to be exec-ing an interpreter which
parses/loads a huge pile of standard library modules every time
Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote:
Sadly not all servers speak CGI this days, most notably nginx, and
others often have broken CGI support.
Oh? I guess I just never tried CGI with nginx.
the called CGI script can't be 'preforked' because
before you fork a CGI script you have to set the rel
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Paul Weber
wrote:
> Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote:
>>
>> CGD runs as a FastCGI wrapper (to be used with nginx or similar web
>> server) or as a standalone HTTP server, handing over all requests to a
>> given CGI script.
>
>
> Is this just a wrapper fo
prefork
Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote:
CGD runs as a FastCGI wrapper (to be used with nginx or similar web
server) or as a standalone HTTP server, handing over all requests to a
given CGI script.
Is this just a wrapper for compatability (which seems odd, since most
servers also speak CGI), or do
Hello.
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:42:02 +0200 Aurélien Aptel
wrote:
> Changeset 317 (14adb004eb78) introduced tw and th in the XWindow
> struct. They are currently equivalent to the window width and height
> (x.w and x.h). What are their purpose?
The tty size is different from the window size. T
Changeset 317 (14adb004eb78) introduced tw and th in the XWindow
struct. They are currently equivalent to the window width and height
(x.w and x.h). What are their purpose?
27 matches
Mail list logo
