Re: [dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread pancake
On 06/11/12 18:32, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote: * pancake [2012-06-11 17:05]: Anyway, i have noticed that META-h means go back and scroll left, which probably that originates from the snippet I posted and didn't post the proper patch. In that case META-l should have the same issue. I have MO

Re: [dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread stanio
* pancake [2012-06-11 17:05]: > Anyway, i have noticed that META-h means go back and scroll left, which probably that originates from the snippet I posted and didn't post the proper patch. In that case META-l should have the same issue. I have MOD|SHIFT-l/h for history navigation while MOD-l/h

Re: Sta.li critical performance question (WAS [dev] obase - Sta.li moving forward?)

2012-06-11 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:23:16 -0500 Strake wrote: > On 08/06/2012, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > > On the linked page, Johan Petersson wrote: > > > >> It turns out, though, that system calls invoked via interrupts are > >> remarkably slow on the more recent members of the x86 processor > >> family.

Re: [dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread pancake
On 06/11/12 16:12, Nick wrote: Quoth pancake: surf.c: In function ‘gotheaders’: surf.c:337:11: warning: variable ‘uri’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] Good spot. My gcc doesn't catch that, but you're right, it is unused. I'm attaching a patch that removes use of that variable, plus

Re: [dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread Nick
Quoth pancake: > surf.c: In function ‘gotheaders’: > surf.c:337:11: warning: variable ‘uri’ set but not used > [-Wunused-but-set-variable] Good spot. My gcc doesn't catch that, but you're right, it is unused. I'm attaching a patch that removes use of that variable, plus removes a couple of unuse

Re: [dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 11 June 2012 13:48, Nick wrote: > The most annoying feature of surf for me has been that when the > window gets quite small suddenly everything is zoomed to a tiny and > unreadable size. Oh wow, until now I'd assumed this was some Webkit misfeature. Add me to the patch tally. On 11 June 2012

Re: [dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread stanio
> So, here is a patch to tip removing it. I think it should be applied > to tip by somebody with Power. +1 --s_

Re: [dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread pancake
btw. without applying your patch: surf.c: In function ‘gotheaders’: surf.c:337:11: warning: variable ‘uri’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] surf.c: At top level: surf.c:800:1: warning: ‘eval’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] On 06/11/12 14:48, Nick wrote: The most annoyin

[dev] [surf] much slower after switching to debian

2012-06-11 Thread Nick
So I recently switched from my old Gentoo install to a fresh Debian Squeeze box. For the most part it has been a pleasant experience. However, surf is now /much/ slower at rendering. Quite often resizing a window will cause a several second pause before it is redrawn. It's worth noting that my

Re: [dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread pancake
i'm with you. your patch should be in tip. On 06/11/12 14:48, Nick wrote: The most annoying feature of surf for me has been that when the window gets quite small suddenly everything is zoomed to a tiny and unreadable size. This can be a pain if for example I want to keep a couple of lines of tex

[dev] [surf] patch to remove resizing if small

2012-06-11 Thread Nick
The most annoying feature of surf for me has been that when the window gets quite small suddenly everything is zoomed to a tiny and unreadable size. This can be a pain if for example I want to keep a couple of lines of text visible, and devote the rest to some other window. Given that it's so s