On 4/10/12, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> Sounds interesting but since there is no way of communicating with dwm we
> wouldn't gain much. The code for bars and keybindings would also stay. I'm
> rather for going the whole way.
>
Yeah, dwm would still have to draw tag names/icons itself. But do
Hi,
-Original message-
> From:Bjartur Thorlacius
> Sent: Tue 10-Apr-2012 12:09
> To: dev mail list
> Subject: Re: [dev] [dwm] drop the bars (was: systray in upstream dwm?)
>
> On Saturday 07 April 2012 12:13:43 Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> > I wonder how these kind of patches can b
DockApps :) yay
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
wrote:
> On Saturday 07 April 2012 12:13:43 Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
>> I wonder how these kind of patches can be done in a better way. It's clear
>> that including a systray in dwm is not a good idea but it is also not
>>
On Saturday 07 April 2012 12:13:43 Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> I wonder how these kind of patches can be done in a better way. It's clear
> that including a systray in dwm is not a good idea but it is also not
> possible to work around the bar included in dwm. I want to see the mode my
> tag i
