On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:56:01PM +, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> Slock should use a high-level authentication interface that will
> perform whatever authentication the site administrator requires. How
> much does this list hate or love PAM?
PAM can get stuffed, but there's no reason slock can
On 4/7/12, Ben Secrest wrote:
> I'm not sure the best way to differentiate between the shadow vs. NIS
> situation. One guess is that when shadow information is present, the
> pw_passwd field of the passwd struct will contain 'x', '*', or
> whatever the system uses as a placeholder in /etc/passwd.