[dev] [surf] small bug-fixing patch

Surf has had an annoying bug for a long time where a fully loaded page would always have the title set to "[0%] ". This fixes that. diff -r 51a6d05c2c84 surf.c --- a/surf.cMon Mar 26 09:33:42 2012 +0200 +++ b/surf.cSat Apr 07 23:52:23 2012 +0100 @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ if(c->linkhov

Re: [dev] [dwm] drop the bars (was: systray in upstream dwm?)

this might be a bad idea but, the window manager could set an X prop of an array(tag) of arrays(wids) and there could be another app that reads this property and exposes the info in a friendly way so that something else can display the info any way it wants. without having to deal with the content

Re: [dev] [dwm] drop the bars (was: systray in upstream dwm?)

On 7 April 2012 14:35, Lee Fallat wrote: >> Xft and Systray would be implemented by a separate program and all the >> fruitless discussions about the visual stuff, would come to an end. > > > This sounds like a wonderful solution, but I can't see how dwm's status bar > can be implemented via somet

Re: [dev] [dwm] drop the bars (was: systray in upstream dwm?)

> > Xft and Systray would be implemented by a separate program and all the > fruitless discussions about the visual stuff, would come to an end. > This sounds like a wonderful solution, but I can't see how dwm's status bar can be implemented via something like dzen...Things like the current window

Re: [dev] [dwm] drop the bars (was: systray in upstream dwm?)

Somebody claiming to be Luis Anaya wrote: I see the case for a need of a systray, but there are tiling window managers that provide this facility. Also, nice programs like stalonetray which one can run if one needs a systray. -- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See for

RE: [dev] [dwm] drop the bars (was: systray in upstream dwm?)

Hi, My case is not anymore to include the systray patch in dwm, don't get me wrong. I wonder how these kind of patches can be done in a better way. It's clear that including a systray in dwm is not a good idea but it is also not possible to work around the bar included in dwm. I want to see the

RE: [dev] [dwm] drop the bars (was: systray in upstream dwm?)

Hi: I see the case for a need of a systray, but there are tiling window managers that provide this facility. The "awesome" window manager does have systray capability fairly small footprint, something to consider. Dwm is meant to be minimal and it is embedded in its design philosophy and bein