On 6 April 2012 20:40, Martin Kopta wrote:
> Does someone know about some very basic wm, which would basicaly be just
> monocle dwm without any bar and shortcuts? I would use basic xorg, but I
> need to make the app maximized. It is sort of kiosk. Thanks for any advices.
I've contributed a minima
I've run into an issue with slock on a system with both local and
remote users. The default config works with the local users because
the getpw() function queries password information though NSS and then
the shadow system. In the case of remote users, the appropriate
information is retrieved from N
Attached is a first shot at seq(1) for sbase. I do not like having to
juggle data around to play games with sprintf, so if someone has a
cleaner approach to this program, please speak up.
Specifically: everything inside the if(wflag){} block is truly awful.
#include
#include
#include
#include
This just fixes a trivial compiler warning.
diff -r 02cb0c700e64 test.c
--- a/test.c Sat Feb 04 01:16:18 2012 +
+++ b/test.c Fri Apr 06 21:43:48 2012 -0400
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
- bool ret, not = false;
+ bool ret = false, not = false;
progname = argv[0];
A couple of minor patches to st: fix a bug, and mimic xterm cursor when
window is not focused.
--
MarkFrom 5f16c44199580b672d31eb0e9e1a49a59bd0b1b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hills
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 01:04:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Display cursor even when window is not focused
On Fri 06 Apr 14:40, Martin Kopta wrote:
> Does someone know about some very basic wm, which would basicaly be
> just monocle dwm without any bar and shortcuts? I would use basic
> xorg, but I need to make the app maximized. It is sort of kiosk.
> Thanks for any advices.
>
Maybe tinywm[1] fits you
Monster wm
Yes. That is what I am doing now. I just thougth if there is some 10sloc
wm, it would be probably better.
On 04/06/2012 02:42 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On 6 April 2012 14:40, Martin Kopta wrote:
Does someone know about some very basic wm, which would basicaly be just
monocle dwm without any b
On 6 April 2012 14:40, Martin Kopta wrote:
> Does someone know about some very basic wm, which would basicaly be just
> monocle dwm without any bar and shortcuts? I would use basic xorg, but I
> need to make the app maximized. It is sort of kiosk. Thanks for any advices.
Why not taking dwm as sta
this can be done by just tuning the config.h. aka rtfsc
On Apr 6, 2012, at 14:40, Martin Kopta wrote:
> Does someone know about some very basic wm, which would basicaly be just
> monocle dwm without any bar and shortcuts? I would use basic xorg, but I need
> to make the app maximized. It is so
Does someone know about some very basic wm, which would basicaly be just
monocle dwm without any bar and shortcuts? I would use basic xorg, but I
need to make the app maximized. It is sort of kiosk. Thanks for any advices.
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 07:41:56AM +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> Why don't we drop the bars and keybindings and let separate programs
> handle it.
Because then dwm would have to have a custom protocol to describe tag
state to panels, which would then presumably have to poll an interface
Hi,
Sorry for the confusion. I uploaded the patch against the current tip.
The wiki page now contains both patches.
Jan Christoph
On Thu 05-04-2012 12:18 -0500, Micheal Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 11:29:27PM +0200, Arian Kuschki wrote:
> > On 4 April 2012 22:29, Jan Christoph Ebersba
13 matches
Mail list logo