Re: [dev] [9base] the PLAN9PORT C preprocessor definition?

2012-03-19 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 19 March 2012 11:53, Chris Brannon wrote: > I package 9base for ArchLinux, and I just learned that the sha1sum binary > is broken.  On some systems, it crashes > with an error message like the following: > PLAN9PORT wasn't defined when 9base was built. > Adding -DPLAN9PORT to CFLAGS in config.m

Re: [dev] some wmiirc scripts

2012-03-19 Thread hiro
If you want to feel like belonging to Anselm's elite suckless group you'll have to switch to dwm (and update it at full moons), but if you're fine with making up your own opinion you're still free to use wmii as long as it keeps working for you.

[dev] Adding "good" xterm support to st

2012-03-19 Thread Philip Kovac
Regarding one of the goals of 'st,' would the suckless crowd be interested in resolving the current admitted shortcomings of 'st' by rolling in a fairly tiny library called libvterm (bzr repo at http://bazaar.leonerd.org.uk/c/libvterm) by Paul 'Leonerd' Evans (http://www.leonerd.org.uk) for handlin

Re: [dev] [9base] the PLAN9PORT C preprocessor definition?

2012-03-19 Thread Matthew Farkas-Dyck
On 19/03/2012, Chris Brannon wrote: > For me, it runs, but the output is interesting: > > # /opt/plan9/bin/sha1sum /bin/ls > # gives output: > 1215201216261815999003198215442429362069x /bin/ls Same here, also on Arch.

[dev] [9base] the PLAN9PORT C preprocessor definition?

2012-03-19 Thread Chris Brannon
Hi, I package 9base for ArchLinux, and I just learned that the sha1sum binary is broken. On some systems, it crashes with an error message like the following: *** stack smashing detected ***: /opt/plan9/bin/sha1sum_bkp terminated === Backtrace: = /lib/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x45)[0x