Hey there,
I've uploaded an embarrassing howto video of how to gain a neck injury
using dwm 6.0
http://youtu.be/UJuvLOQzSOc
Enjoy,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 21 February 2012 18:36, Peter Hartman wrote:
>>> This is stil is favorable than the current approach as far as I can tell.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>>
>
> I was thinking it would be a more conscise method (also as libsoup
> changes - though as I a
On 21 February 2012 18:36, Peter Hartman wrote:
>> This is stil is favorable than the current approach as far as I can tell.
>
> Why?
>
>
I was thinking it would be a more conscise method (also as libsoup
changes - though as I am looking increasingly through it, it seems
that the current solution
> This is stil is favorable than the current approach as far as I can tell.
Why?
--
sic dicit magister P
University of Toronto / Fordham University
http://individual.utoronto.ca/peterjh
gpg 1024D/ED6EF59B (7D1A 522F D08E 30F6 FA42 B269 B860 352B ED6E F59B)
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-ke
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Nick wrote:
> userbase of < 5 ;)
Hey, just because we're quiet doesn't mean we aren't here.
On 21 February 2012 15:13, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Peter Hartman:
>> The other reason (besides hatred of libsoup) that surf never bothered
>> implementing anything other than what it currently has is that (to my
>> knowledge) there has yet to be a bona fide web-site that the current
>> system fails on
Hi all,
> a slightly better patch attached.
looks like the attachement hasn't made it to the list so I'll try to
repost it again it the message body.
Would it be possible to get it into the main repository?
Thank you,
Tomas
The patch:
>From 08c4b45e2003726a4c3f8d7ef856d5ca5c68aff7 Mon Sep 17
Quoth Peter Hartman:
> The other reason (besides hatred of libsoup) that surf never bothered
> implementing anything other than what it currently has is that (to my
> knowledge) there has yet to be a bona fide web-site that the current
> system fails on. There's a lot of FUD, but none (to my knowl
The other reason (besides hatred of libsoup) that surf never bothered
implementing anything other than what it currently has is that (to my
knowledge) there has yet to be a bona fide web-site that the current
system fails on. There's a lot of FUD, but none (to my knowledge)
that is bona fide. Of
On 21 February 2012 14:30, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:07:28PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> I suppose it shows the attitude of the list.
>
> what it shows is some self-righteous thin-skinned internet guy
>
>> I was merely posting here to point out something possibly helpfu
Hi Calvin,
Quoth Calvin Morrison:
> I'm not sure why nobody has decided to use the documented way from Gtk
> webkit. I think it isn't very sloppy (unless I am just the only
> confused one here)
Probably either it wasn't got around to, or it was a mistaken
attempt to distance the browser somewhat
g
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Calvin Morrison wrote:
you seem upset. stop it
After posting here for the first time, I was met with hostile comments
by Christoph. It is a little bit upsetting when someone attacks
something you work on (be it a good or bad project). It was rather
uncalled for. I suppo
On 21 February 2012 09:57, clamiax wrote:
> it would be nice if Jan Christoph Ebersbach would remove its garbage
> along with all unreachable URLs from the moveresize patch page to its
> own page, maybe maximize_vert_horz, which have nothing to do with
> moveresize. Also it would be great to move
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:07:28PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> I suppose it shows the attitude of the list.
what it shows is some self-righteous thin-skinned internet guy
> I was merely posting here to point out something possibly helpful. I
> guess that warrants an attack on myself.
you we
Hey,
I don't know about the cookie handling in surf, but I'm sure there's a
reason. Perhaps someone more involved with surf can explain.
On 21 February 2012 19:07, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> After posting here for the first time, I was met with hostile comments
> by Christoph. It is a little bit u
> you seem upset. stop it
After posting here for the first time, I was met with hostile comments
by Christoph. It is a little bit upsetting when someone attacks
something you work on (be it a good or bad project). It was rather
uncalled for. I suppose it shows the attitude of the list.
I was mere
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:34:07PM -0500, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> Because surf is a non-tabbed editor the doesn't seek the same goals as
> mine? yeah that's probably why. This browser was a weekend project
> which i spent some time hacking on, not a full browser not intended to
> be.
http://tools
On 21 February 2012 13:22, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Calvin Morrison wrote:
>> I have written my own tabbed browser called sb [1], it has cookie
>> handling built in very simple and the cookie file is a flat file
>> format. This is all done with libsoup.
>>
>> The co
Somebody claiming to be Christoph Lohmann wrote:
And btw., »GPLv3 except stuff under MIT/X from surf« – I don't
think such culture bolshevism is legal.
It's definitely legal, though one might want to be more specific about which
"stuff" is MIT licensed.
--
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See
Greetings.
Calvin Morrison wrote:
> I have written my own tabbed browser called sb [1], it has cookie
> handling built in very simple and the cookie file is a flat file
> format. This is all done with libsoup.
>
> The code required to do this is minimal, and in my code it took 2 lines [2]
>
> w.
Hello,
This is my first post here, though I actively follow the developments
around here. I was reading the Project Ideas section on the website
and read about ideas for surf's cookie handling.
"The biggest disadvantage of surf is sloppy cookie handling. libwebkit
and libsoup (which are used for
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:55:20 +0100, Florian Limberger wrote:
Greetings list,
I have hacked up a simple xmessage replacement which looks neater,
has dmenu-like handling and supports unicode.
And I am obviously too tired to write mails.
Code now attached.
-flo
smessage.tar.bz2
Description: BZ
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:55:20AM +0100, Florian Limberger wrote:
> I have hacked up a simple xmessage replacement which looks neater,
> has dmenu-like handling and supports unicode.
Linky?
Abby Cedar writes:
> Need to close stdout otherwise it can't be used in a script until surf
> finishes.
>
> To test, try the below before and after the patch.
Thanks, I pushed your fix. For religious reasons, I changed it to us
fclose() rather than freopen().
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
Greetings list,
I have hacked up a simple xmessage replacement which looks neater,
has dmenu-like handling and supports unicode.
Since this is my first real project, I appreciate serious criticism of
the code.
Thanks go out to Christoph Lohmann for svkb/thingmenu, which inspired
various pieces
Hi,
it would be nice if Jan Christoph Ebersbach would remove its garbage
along with all unreachable URLs from the moveresize patch page to its
own page, maybe maximize_vert_horz, which have nothing to do with
moveresize. Also it would be great to move its moveresize
implementation to a more approp
26 matches
Mail list logo
