On 12 February 2012 19:17, wrote:
> Idea taken from
> http://code.swtch.com/plan9port/issue/88/build-errors-and-warnings-at-openbsd-50
> Fixes also the use of * in rc.
Thanks, applied.
-Anselm
Idea taken from
http://code.swtch.com/plan9port/issue/88/build-errors-and-warnings-at-openbsd-50
Fixes also the use of * in rc.
Julien
diff -rup 9base/lib9/dirread.c 9base-fixed/lib9/dirread.c
--- 9base/lib9/dirread.cSun Feb 12 18:00:39 2012
+++ 9base-fixed/lib9/dirread.c Sun Feb 12 19:06
On 02/11/2012 01:50 PM, Joseph Iacobucci wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 05:03 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> It does not contain other potential features that were requested
>> during the years, like displaying some text in case the user hits his
>> keyboard. Such features will be subject to future slock rel
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:59:30AM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
> I know it has been already discussed here, but I could not find any
> final solution. The process viewer htop isn't drawing properly in st
> [1]. Current load, cpu, mem, swap and other user processes aren't
> visible. xterm shows them
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 05:14:22PM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 04:26 PM, Rob wrote:
> >All the programs I use work fine in st, except htop, ..
>
> I am glad to hear that.
I use urxvt as my main terminal though, but as far as I'm aware, anyway.
> >Although I wrote my own process mon
On 02/12/2012 04:26 PM, Rob wrote:
All the programs I use work fine in st, except htop, ..
I am glad to hear that.
Although I wrote my own process monitor (http://github.com/jeffwar/utop)
with vi key bindings, since I found it annoying that I kept having to use
the arrow keys in htop
I have
On 02/12/2012 12:08 PM, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Martin Kopta wrote:
I hoped for easy solution where I won't have to modify all the hosts I know
and all the hosts I will ever meet in the future. Thank you however for your
proposed solution.
The easiest solution i
Plan 9 always sucks less than unix.
On Feb 12, 2012 8:38 AM, "Bjartur Thorlacius" wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:09:44 -, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
>> might know how in the good old days all the environment
I've yet to see a functioning microkernel smaller than the plan 9 kernel.
On Feb 12, 2012 8:34 AM, "Pierre Chapuis" wrote:
> On 2012-02-11 22:35, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>
> All the real fun seems to happen in L4
>>
>
> And Minix3. Microkernels will win, eventually...
>
> --
> Pierre Chapuis
>
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:15:34AM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
>
> Thank you for pointing me back to the original messages about
> st/htop. Unfortunately, as I said, I haven't find any solution. The
> message from Stefan Mark does mention that "I agree that in case of
> htop its a bug, because both
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 01:09:44PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades.
>
> Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
> might know how in the good old days all the environment variables
> were standardized. What I am up to: There are these new stylish
> ways o
- Original Message -
> From: Bjartur Thorlacius
> Bind mount or symlink. Do not construct pathnames from environment variables.
> mount -o bind /usr/bin/vim /bin/editor
> In fact, the /etc/alternatives mess of Debian would be acceptable, if it were
> not for the symlinks from /usr/bin
Hi Joseph,
On 11 February 2012 19:50, Joseph Iacobucci wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 05:03 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> It does not contain other potential features that were requested
>> during the years, like displaying some text in case the user hits his
>> keyboard. Such features will be subject to
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:09:44 -, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
might know how in the good old days all the environment variables
were standardized. What I am up to: There are these new stylish
ways of running application
On 2012-02-11 22:35, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
All the real fun seems to happen in L4
And Minix3. Microkernels will win, eventually...
--
Pierre Chapuis
I don't get what you're trying to do.
On 02/12/2012 13:09, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings comrades.
Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
might know how in the good old days all the environment variables
were standardized. What I am up to: There are these new stylish
ways of running applications based on
Greetings comrades.
Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
might know how in the good old days all the environment variables
were standardized. What I am up to: There are these new stylish
ways of running applications based on their file extensions or
mime types, which is a
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Martin Kopta wrote:
> I hoped for easy solution where I won't have to modify all the hosts I know
> and all the hosts I will ever meet in the future. Thank you however for your
> proposed solution.
The easiest solution is to set TERM to "xterm" in your config.h. O
On 02/12/2012 12:59 AM, Martin Kopta wrote:
I know it has been already discussed here, but I could not find any
final solution. The process viewer htop isn't drawing properly in st
[1]. Current load, cpu, mem, swap and other user processes aren't
visible. xterm shows them fine, using dark grey co
On 02/12/2012 01:12 AM, Rob wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:59:30AM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
The process viewer htop isn't drawing properly in st [1].
Is there know solution for st/htop drawing problem?
This is a known "bug", I think the thread on it before is here [1]
Basically, st doesn'
21 matches
Mail list logo
