On Thu 29 Dec 2011 07:20:21 PM PST, Nick wrote:
> The Arch community [...] seem to have [...] uninformed people
> doing strange things in their midst. All good practise and
> experimentation and whathaveyou, but
It's a bazaar of artist/tinkerers sharing, learning, and having fun.
> can be annoyi
>
> first thing i noticed. kind of kills the functionality unless it has SOME
> kind of 'virtual desktop'/tag ability, unless you only use 1-3 windows at a
> time, EVER. looks like oversimplification at the expense of flexibility.
>
>
Oops, my bad. There is a 'desktops' function... but I prefer ta
Quoth Kurt H Maier:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 08:55:21PM -0800, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> > monsterwm[1] is a cool new dwm fork that's currently less than 700 SLOC
> > while sporting bstack and grid layouts in addition to tile and monocle.
>
> it doesn't do tagging at all, as far as I can tell.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>
>
> it doesn't do tagging at all, as far as I can tell.
>
first thing i noticed. kind of kills the functionality unless it has SOME
kind of 'virtual desktop'/tag ability, unless you only use 1-3 windows at a
time, EVER. looks like oversimpli
I just upgraded from 5.9, and 6.0 looks great. It's the first time
I've used nmaster, and it works really well for my tiny laptop
screen usecase. I expect it to work well in a different way for my
enormous screen at work too. Which is great as I now don't need any
patches, and things all work g
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 08:55:21PM -0800, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
> monsterwm[1] is a cool new dwm fork that's currently less than 700 SLOC
> while sporting bstack and grid layouts in addition to tile and monocle.
it doesn't do tagging at all, as far as I can tell.
> It's very popular[2] these d
