> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:36:57PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Roger wrote:
>> (... think hplip pulls it in, as well as anything written using QT.)
>
>fyi hplip only needs dbus for the scan-to-fax functionality. if you
>don't need that it will build without dbus
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:17:02PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote:
>[2011-12-04 21:35] Roger
>> Checking memory usage between XFCE4 and DWM, I find XFCE4 uses only ~30MB
>> more then DWM.
>>
>> 100MB - DWM + Xorg
>> 130MB - XFCE4
>
>I'm a bit confused: Doesn't XFCE set on top of Xorg?
>
>Could s
[2011-12-04 21:35] Roger
> Checking memory usage between XFCE4 and DWM, I find XFCE4 uses only ~30MB
> more then DWM.
>
> 100MB - DWM + Xorg
> 130MB - XFCE4
I'm a bit confused: Doesn't XFCE set on top of Xorg?
Could someone please explain.
meillo
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Roger wrote:
> (... think hplip pulls it in, as well as anything written using QT.)
fyi hplip only needs dbus for the scan-to-fax functionality. if you
don't need that it will build without dbus just fine.
--
# Kurt H Maier
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:19:56PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>Greetings.
>
>Roger wrote:
>>
>> Anyways, the man reason for posting was just to note the memory resource
>> difference between DWM and XFCE4. I still prefer DWM over XFCE4 as I can
>> easily manage it using keyboard.
>
>XFCE
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:19:56PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>Greetings.
>
>Roger wrote:
>>
>> Anyways, the man reason for posting was just to note the memory resource
>> difference between DWM and XFCE4. I still prefer DWM over XFCE4 as I can
>> easily manage it using keyboard.
>
>XFCE
Greetings.
Roger wrote:
>
> Anyways, the man reason for posting was just to note the memory resource
> difference between DWM and XFCE4. I still prefer DWM over XFCE4 as I can
> easily manage it using keyboard.
XFCE is infected by the dbus virus. So be careful and use condoms.
Sincerely,
C
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Sime Ramov wrote:
>* Roger [2011-12-04 21:35-0900]:
>> (I'm going to gander, Xorg uses around 60-70MB, with 20-30MB for other
>> resources. Man Xorg is a beast on memory!)
>
>That's interesting, Xorg uses 28-30 MB on my (64 bit) system, plus 2844K
>herbs
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:35:04 -, Roger wrote:
(I'm going to gander, Xorg uses around 60-70MB, with 20-30MB for other
resources. Man Xorg is a beast on memory!)
Note that clients can consume quite a lot of resources on the Xserver, and
the Xserver may be reluctant to free them when client
Roger once said:
> Checking memory usage between XFCE4 and DWM,
> I find XFCE4 uses only ~30MB more then DWM.
>
> 100MB - DWM + Xorg
> 130MB - XFCE4
>
> 2x750 P3 w/ 1GB RAM
>
> (I'm going to gander, Xorg uses around 60-70MB,
> with 20-30MB for other resources. Man Xorg is a
> beast on memory!)
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:26:44AM +0100, hiro wrote:
>Yeah, Xorg barely runs on one of my PCs because of memory constraints.
>
I can't believe xorg requires this much memory to run. I'm even using Gentoo
which has modular xorg packages, so only the parts of xorg I need are compiled
and insta
* Roger [2011-12-04 21:35-0900]:
> (I'm going to gander, Xorg uses around 60-70MB, with 20-30MB for other
> resources. Man Xorg is a beast on memory!)
That's interesting, Xorg uses 28-30 MB on my (64 bit) system, plus 2844K
herbstluftwm (WM I use).
Yeah, Xorg barely runs on one of my PCs because of memory constraints.
13 matches
Mail list logo
