Hi Anselm,
On 10 November 2011 21:21, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> I thought about this a while and I have to say I'm in favor to have a
> bold decision to apply it to hg tip in order to test this in a broader
> environment. This could lead to reducing the "Wildwuchs" of the other
> layout patches on
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 17:33, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> Clang (cool, but bytecode)
What do you mean? Yes, LLVM uses what it calls bitcode as part of the
process, but the final result is a native binary.
-Truls
side note: clang 3.0 binaries are faster
here (penryn) than gcc46's
MOAR POWAH!1
PS. No, I will not build audio encoders
with fucking pcc. Actually, I may try it
for amusement.
8c.
In my defence, I both searched through the mailing list page using my
browser, and searched for "xv6 site:suckless.org" with DDG, without
finding anything. After Kurt pointed out that it had been discussed
before, I tried the same query with Google, which found one mail
mentioning xv6 in the middle
I know members of this list have endorsed and even suggested use of tcc
and nwcc. While tcc is interesting, and may compile C89 programs, it lacks
some C99 features. C1X may not be implemented at all. And while icc may be
a fine compiler, it's proprietary. For a compiler, that's unacceptable.
Cope with it, this is a mailing list. It's easier to post.
You might want to create a stupid PHP script backed by mysql and call
it the suckless forum.
On 12 November 2011 09:35, pmarin wrote:
> Im trying to create static linked executables for dwm and demu but Im
> still having problems.
> I have followed this post[1] but Im having the following errors (with
> dwm)[2].
> Have someone had better luck? How is the confing.mk?
> Im using Ubunt
Hi all.
Im trying to create static linked executables for dwm and demu but Im
still having problems.
I have followed this post[1] but Im having the following errors (with dwm)[2].
Have someone had better luck? How is the confing.mk?
Im using Ubuntu 8.04 with dwm-5.9
[1]
http://blog.plenz.com
