Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Benjamin R. Haskell
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Roger wrote: I'm using dwm-5.9. I'd love to get a dwm-.ebuild into Gentoo, but some hate cvs/svn/git ebuilds and I have a tough time getting them into Gentoo. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to have an ebuild in the first place for a piece of software that requ

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Roger
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 06:07:38PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >Hey, > >On 10/11/2011, Roger wrote: >> Seems DWM takes precedence over the mplayer's options concerning monitor >> placement. So using the dwm.h file is best for specifying monitor? > >dwm does take precedence, yes, since it ti

Re: [dev] wmii + ruby 1.9.3 = no power woes!

2011-11-10 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 8 November 2011 07:28, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote: > On Thu 03 Nov 2011 09:57:19 AM PDT, Kurt H Maier wrote: >> There is nothing "suckless" about any aspect of modern wmii > > I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies; > has this changed?  If so, why? The overall concept

Re: [dev] A general approach to master-slave layouts

2011-11-10 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi Connor, On 6 November 2011 20:28, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > I've been thinking about this patch for a while, and I've knocked > together a patch which takes an alternative approach, which seems to > result in a simpler diff. > > In my patch each layout has three arrangement functions, one for

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 10/11/2011, Roger wrote: > Mplayer's > -xineramascreen option has no effect on monitor placement and mplayer's > -geometry seems to act a little funny. dwm ignores -geometry, unless it's floating, since we don't honour USPosition / USSize. I have suggested we patch this before, but others thou

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Connor Lane Smith
Hey, On 10/11/2011, Roger wrote: > Seems DWM takes precedence over the mplayer's options concerning monitor > placement. So using the dwm.h file is best for specifying monitor? dwm does take precedence, yes, since it tiles the window instead of letting it float. Out of interest, could you post

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Roger
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 07:35:25AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote: >On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Ruben Mikkonen wrote: >>> Is there anything I can use to force an application (ie mplayer) to start >>> on >>> Monitor1 using the console/terminal on Monitor0, instead of always having >>> to >>> move

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Roger
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +0200, Ruben Mikkonen wrote: > DISPLAY="display" program, if I recall correctly. > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Roger <[1]rogerx@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've just configured two monitors on one NVidia card (DVI-I-1 and VGA-0) > using > t

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Ruben Mikkonen wrote: >> Is there anything I can use to force an application (ie mplayer) to start >> on >> Monitor1 using the console/terminal on Monitor0, instead of always having >> to >> move the mouse to the second display and using DMenu? The last field in t

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Ruben Mikkonen
DISPLAY="display" program, if I recall correctly. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Roger wrote: > I've just configured two monitors on one NVidia card (DVI-I-1 and VGA-0) > using > the Nouveau driver. (For more info and configuration, see Gentoo-Wiki DWM > web > page, easily found using Google

[dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Roger
I've just configured two monitors on one NVidia card (DVI-I-1 and VGA-0) using the Nouveau driver. (For more info and configuration, see Gentoo-Wiki DWM web page, easily found using Google.) >From what I see, the xinerama configure option is not Xorg Xinerama Extension related, but provides ge