On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:28:59 -0800
"Suraj N. Kurapati" wrote:
>On Thu 03 Nov 2011 09:57:19 AM PDT, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>> There is nothing "suckless" about any aspect of modern wmii
>
>I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
>has this changed? If so, why?
>
>And how i
On Thu 03 Nov 2011 09:57:19 AM PDT, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> There is nothing "suckless" about any aspect of modern wmii
I thought Suckless folks were enthusiastic about Plan9 technologies;
has this changed? If so, why?
And how is "modern" wmii different from its, let's say, "pre-modern"
phase? Fr
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
> wrote:
> > hm. I see. So your argument was to disown wmii, because this *specific*
> > configuration - and NOT wmii itself - requires ruby. Alright.
>
> No, I want to disown wmii because it's
I'm in favor of this man porn.
On Nov 7, 2011 5:12 PM, "Justin Pogue" wrote:
> Dibs on writing the keyboard vs mouse for porn viewing documentation.
> We could sneak it in as an extra man page with DWM. man porn
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> > O
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Justin Pogue wrote:
> man porn
All pornography is male-oriented and oppressive.
--
# Kurt H Maier
Dibs on writing the keyboard vs mouse for porn viewing documentation.
We could sneak it in as an extra man page with DWM. man porn
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Of course we have huge disparities and holy fights, like how
> to edit text or if it is mo
Suckless should stay as-is,
but clarify (as done in this thread) its ideals – as you try to, too.
Such rules then can be used to define what »suckless« really is.
To "suck less" is about subjectivity. It's a matter of taste.
Suckless.org is about software tools available for everybody.
Not abou
(I apologize for my MUA failing as hard as it does...)
While I agree that a collection of suckless tools under one roof
wouldbe pretty awesome (especially something like sta.li or witch
linux), I'mnot sure that marketing as a desktop environment is the
right thing to do.
I'm part of a small project called tudor[0] that aims to replicate a
DE experience
On 11/07/11 at 09:34pm, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> But yes, the users we want in suckless should be sophisticated
> enough to find this out on their own. We are taking the subset of
> users from the Ubuntu[0]-educated crowd and filter them for the
> real suckless users, that could spread our ideas.
On 7 November 2011 21:34, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> It is not about adding something real. Suckless should stay as-is,
> but clarify (as done in this thread) its ideals – as you try to, too.
> Such rules then can be used to define what »suckless« really is.
> But the question is, i
Greetings.
I am just answering Anselm, but try to answer the open questions
of the other postings too.
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Another remark:
>
> On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>> reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
>> terminology to m
On 7 November 2011 15:13, Sean Howard wrote:
> > The idea would be to first have an identity, the »Suckless
> > Desktop«, which needs a logo, some texts and then links to
> > the various parts of suckless. This would be the entrypoint
> > for new users, where they can decide, what to adopt to or
Another remark:
On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
> terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
> less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
> This does not sell. Instea
* Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> [2011-11-07 20:23]:
> terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. [...] Instead
> a whole environment could be promoted, which is usable across
> platforms.
Why?
Promote to whom?
What is your final goal: to educate the masses in order to get bett
Somebody claiming to be Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
>
> reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
> terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
> less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
> This does not sell. Instead a whole
On 7 November 2011 20:21, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
>
> reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
> terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
> less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
> This does not sell.
Can I vote this "best of"?
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> The very use of the phrase "Desktop Environment" betrays your
> low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal conspiracy to
> restrict social mobility of non-institutional entity-computer
> interfaces. Your at
The very use of the phrase "Desktop Environment" betrays your
low-lying commitment to the capitalist patriarchal conspiracy to
restrict social mobility of non-institutional entity-computer
interfaces. Your attempt to sidetrack philosophical advances by
creating a cult of information around your pa
Greetings comrades,
reading [0] got me into thinking, if we need some plain new
terminology to make suckless more usable for the press. Suck-
less by now is just a repository of tools or a philosophy.
This does not sell. Instead a whole environment could be pro-
moted, which is usable across platf
20 matches
Mail list logo
