Re: [dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-27 Thread mikshaw
 As said, 4:3 monitors benefit greatly from it.  I might not have much interest if I had a widescreen monitor, or a much larger screen, but as it stands bstack is practically a necessity for me.  It's a perfect layout for having mc together with a terminal or two, which I nearly always do. As

Re: [dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-27 Thread Kurt H Maier
I've never in my life used bstack and I see nothing more 'generally useful' about it than any other layout. If you want to include bstack, it should be distributed in its own source file and managed via config.h. -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] Re: Suckless sh [Was: Re: New utility]

2011-09-27 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On 9/26/11, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > Okay. I'm a bit brain-dead this week but if I remember right: > > This puts stdout and stderr in the same place: > $ foo 2>&1 | bar > > This puts them in different places: > $ foo 2>&1 > file > Didn't rc fix this by executing file and file descriptor redire

Re: [dev] [dwm] merging bottom stack?

2011-09-27 Thread stanio
* Nick [2011-09-26 22:28]: > It's pretty non-intrusive, Well, that means that it is no pain at all to patch yourself, when you need it. > > though I think only the bstack layout is generally useful enough This is quite arbitrary conclusion. I love and use ocasionally both layouts. -- st