On 5 June 2011 02:34, Rafa Garcia Gallego
wrote:
> Well, those are the ASCII characters you have to produce. My keyboard
> (fairly standard setxkbmap us altgr-intl -option ctrl:nocaps),
> produces them as follows:
> C-_ with Ctrl-/ and Ctrl-7
> C-^ with Ctrl-6
>
> If this were standard (though I'm
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Some things I've noticed:
> 1. Vertical movement doesn't take tabs into account for horizontal offset.
Yeah, that's the first item in my TODO list, yet I keep postponing it
even though it seems simple enogh. It also includes moving
I was looking for this type of tool the other night so I could
script an alt+tab type script for dmenu. Awesome. I'll let you
know how it goes.
On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:41:24 +0100
Sir Cyrus wrote:
>
> What's the most suckless Linux distribution?
>
What about Alpine Linux[1]?
As said before GNU parts sucks so much, that even Linux kernel looks
good. Alpine Linux uses Busybox and uclibc by default. No GNU coreutils
and no glibc in base s
Hey all,
lsw-0.2 is out! lsw is one of our smaller tools, so I don't expect
much fanfare, but its new features (being able to specify the parent
window, and an XID-listing flag) make it more useful for use in
scripts, like switching windows in dwm or tabbed via dmenu. So that's
quite nice.
hg rep
> - skvm (dunno, don't get it) ??
I think this mounts removable drives when you plug them in. If not it at least
makes a mount point and (I think) adds them to /etc/fstab. It depends on hal
and dbus, I'm sure there's no need for that: I can imagine a script doing this
job, with the only caveat
Hey,
Some things I've noticed:
1. Vertical movement doesn't take tabs into account for horizontal offset.
2. The manpage seems incomplete -- it doesn't mention undo, for instance.
3. The config.h undo/redo bindings seem really obscure, at least on
my keyboard, and I couldn't actually get red
On 04/06/2011 16:03, hiro wrote:
This is the first time I've ever heard anyone say this. Configuring a
linux kernel is much easier than, say, packaging it. There's also
'make allyesconfig'.
Kernel documentation sucks a lot.
I can't say I've ever had a problem with it. Each option has a lit
> This is the first time I've ever heard anyone say this. Configuring a
> linux kernel is much easier than, say, packaging it. There's also
> 'make allyesconfig'.
Kernel documentation sucks a lot.
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> Having done it (a long time ago) I have to agree. It's fine up to a point,
> but that point leaves you able to run little more than what you can in Plan
> 9. You get more hardware compatibility than with Plan 9 of course, but that
> b
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:14:15 +0200
hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 13:44, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> > On 6/3/11, Sir Cyrus wrote:
> >> What's the most suckless Linux distribution?
> >>
> > The one you made yourself.
> >
> >
>
> Too subjective, too much work, sucks.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 13:44, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On 6/3/11, Sir Cyrus wrote:
>> What's the most suckless Linux distribution?
>>
> The one you made yourself.
>
>
Too subjective, too much work, sucks.
Change. Hope.
To play with, I recommend looking at 9front (extended variant of Plan9)
http://code.google.com/p/plan9front/
I recently made a native install and it works pretty darn good! (still
need to figure out a number of things but that is basically due to
lack of knowledge - I seem to have an issue with wri
14 matches
Mail list logo
