On 24 May 2011 20:25, Sir Cyrus wrote:
> In that case, best of luck to you lot! Though surely a core utilities
> project with this same philosophy in mind _has_ to exist somewhere...?
Not that I've found. Simple hackability isn't often an aim for software.
On 25 May 2011 00:57, hiro <23h...@goog
Maybe most people on earth aren't masochists and try to do something
more productive instead?
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 18:53, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I'm using dwm-hg aka dwm 5.9 with dwm-5.8.2-pertag_without_bar.diff, and I
> have a problem with layouts and setfocus "feature" (commit 7e2a8fec8d6c).
> Firefox by default is using tag 9, so go to tag 9 and set monocle layout,
>
In that case, best of luck to you lot! Though surely a core utilities
project with this same philosophy in mind _has_ to exist somewhere...?
Sir Cyrus writes:
> Not too clued in on coreutils alternatives, but what's wrong with
> busybox?
Enormously ugly code (IMO worse than GNU coreutils, but in a different
way), and not much hackability. It's designed for something much
different than sbase.
--
\ Troels
/\ Henriksen
Not too clued in on coreutils alternatives, but what's wrong with busybox?
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Christian Neukirchen
wrote:
> Remotely reminds me of http://code.google.com/p/aoeui/ which also is
> pretty lightweight, has UTF8, is binary-safe, and has infinite
> undo. ~7KLOC, no curses dependency.
This reminds me of my very own sandy[1]. Sorry for the blatant
Kurt H Maier writes:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
>> Looking forward to it. imo we need a new editor...
>
> I like this:
> http://www.stabie-soft.com/sre/re.html
>
> it's no sam, but for short one-off edits (or even as a pager) I like
> it.
Remotely reminds me of
On Tue, 24 May 2011 13:12:39 +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
I don't understand why so few people on this list are interested in
Minix3. ~5k LOC for a POSIX-compatible kernel that can run most of
the software you need on a Unix box sounds nice to me.
I'm secretly very fond of Minix. I remember ge
On 24 May 2011 12:57, Rob wrote:
> I'm not sure whether moving up a directory will always work, what if
> you're in $HOME and do
> rm -r /tmp/dir1 ./dir2
Ugh, you're right. That means we'll have to do the never-quite-sure
buffer allocation stuff in rm as well. It's getting tiring having to
write
On 23 May 2011 20:08, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On 5/23/11, Rob wrote:
>> Finally, I have an editor in the works, unfinished, but I plan to show
>> you lot at some point though.
> Interesting. More details, or show me the code. What's novel about him?
Nothing novel I'm afraid, I'm still waitin
On 24 May 2011 12:54, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 24 May 2011 11:45, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
>> If you push that to the extreme you want to understand how the kernel
>> works too. So you should make sure those tools work on Minix3 so that
>> you can achieve "big picture" understanding.
>
> Fair p
On 24 May 2011 11:45, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
> If you push that to the extreme you want to understand how the kernel
> works too. So you should make sure those tools work on Minix3 so that
> you can achieve "big picture" understanding.
Fair point, though since we're pushing for a POSIX subset they
On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:55 +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
So where does this fit in? Okay, this is basically my computing
tactic: simplifying my operating system to the point where I can
actually understand what on Earth is going on. When I use a system
like Ubuntu and Gnome, when shit breaks
On 24 May 2011 07:00, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Now my alarm bells ring. Why is getopt() a good idea? What's wrong
> with making no assumptions and checking flags with strcmp like we did
> in suckless tools? I understand why ARGBEGIN { } ARGEND is no option
> for the -- case, but I really can't see
Hi,
On 24 May 2011 10:17, alphachi wrote:
> I can use AdvanceMAME in dwm before a few days.
> When I update to the latest nvidia-driver, the blackscreen occured after
> running AdvanceMAME.
> I think it's the problem of nvidia-driver, but when I use the other window
> manager, for example, enlig
I can use AdvanceMAME in dwm before a few days.
When I update to the latest nvidia-driver, the blackscreen occured after
running AdvanceMAME.
I think it's the problem of nvidia-driver, but when I use the other window
manager, for example, enlightenment, AdvanceMAME is OK.
Is it the problem of dwm?
17 matches
Mail list logo
